Ever wonder how these large national builders are able to offer "low builder rate of xxx"? These builders are purchasing forward commitments from banks. It is effectively a prepaid rate buydown, but it has a lot of unique benefits that are rarely considered:
Pros:
1) The builder avoids the standard seller concession limits. Because the commitment is a prepaid expense before going into contract, the cost of it does not count toward the seller's concessions which allows them to buy the rate down more than what would otherwise be allowed by VA/FHA/Fannie/Freddie etc.
2) The builder can use it for marketing and by offering lower rates, they are able to attract a larger buyer pool and offload inventory faster which is the name of the game to recycle capital into the next project.
3) They are customizable, you can see the costs and determine if you want to buy the rates down 1% or 2% (or more) or if you want to add 2/1 or 3/2/1 buydowns as well to further incentivize purchase activity.
4) The builder and the lender can build a more streamlined process since they are effectively partners and the builder does not have to worry about different approvals from different lenders and whether or not the transactions are going to go through.
Cons:
1) Forward commitments are costly. However, when compared to what the builder would have to sell a home for to be able to offer the same monthly payment to the consumer, the sale price would be even lower than the list price - forward commitment cost. Example: Average sale price is 500k and the current market rates for a conventional loan are 7%. A builder could offer 5% rates instead of 7% and it would cost the builder $45,000 (expensive, I know). But the consumer sees that with 5% down, their principal and interest payment is only $2,550 instead of $3,160. For the builder to sell the home WITH the market rate of 7% AND offer the same payment, the builder would have to reduce the purchase price from 500k all the way down to 380k. So the buyer is getting a 500k property for the same payment as a 380k property, and the builder is only paying $45,000 instead of selling for $120k less. These are hypothetical numbers but just to paint a picture.
2) Forward commitments are short duration. Typically they are purchased in 30, 60 or 90 day increments. What happens when 90 days goes by and no buyers? The builder is out that $45,000 cost and has to renew again. --> We do this differently to reduce a lot of the holding risk because we want to help small to mid-sized builders have the same advantage that large builders have without this risk.
The forward commitment, just like anything in the lending space, can be a very powerful tool to skyrocket your business or it can be a massive detriment if not applied wisely and correctly.
I have found a lot of mid-sized developers lately that have never even heard of this option so thought I would share for anyone else in that boat.
If you, as a builder/developer, are having no issues moving inventory quickly then this product is likely not for you, but if your homes are sitting 60-90 days and you would like to speed up your sales, this can be a powerful marketing tool to get the homes sold.
Let me know if I missed anything or if anyone has experience using them and what their experience was!