Quick case study I was hoping to get a couple of updated opinions on.
I inherited tenants in a duplex I just purchased. Long story short, I honored the existing lease which had a low security deposit (<50% of rent), and low rent (75% of market rent). They only had two months left on the lease. First month, late. Then said they would pay on the 12th. Missed it. I filed eviction. Finally paid on 16th with all late fees. Tenant claims husband lost job and finally has another one. Month #2 (this month), 11 days late. Payment received with late fees.
Now I have asked them to fill out an application for the property to qualify for my lease. I suggested that if they were denied I would give them one month at a rate $100 higher than current rent payment before they have to leave. Sure, perhaps I'm a big naive but I honestly want to keep a good relationship since their security deposit is so low I don't want them to destroy the place.
That being said, the tenant was surprised that I could and would actually deny them. She states they are good tenants and have paid for many of the upgrades in the place. She also warned me that they don't have great credit, the husband has had some past misdemeanors and they walked out on their last landlord to move into this place.
I'm thinking I have two options 1) deny the application and get rid of them. Lick my wounds if they do damage to the place. 2) accept the application but on a month to month basis. This gives me flexibility to kick them out (South Carolina eviction laws aren't bad).
Thoughts?
P.S. this is a quick attempt at getting more keyword hits for better advice ----> Buy and hold. Tenant. Landlord. Cash Flow. Charleston. Carolina. Rental. Property Manager. Hope it works.