Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Brad L.

Brad L. has started 3 posts and replied 177 times.

Post: Blanket / Portfolio loan

Brad L.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Manitowoc, WI
  • Posts 178
  • Votes 186

Are you using a local lender or one of the big guys? I'm in a smaller town in Wisconsin, and just about every local lender here does them. In fact, I just did one 2 months ago.

Post: Super confused on 30-year mortgages . . . ?

Brad L.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Manitowoc, WI
  • Posts 178
  • Votes 186

@Kyle Shepherd has nothing to do with your loan officer being “good” or “bad”, some banks operate that way in that if you are not occupying the property they only offer commercial financing. More often than not I’d bet it’s a policy thing not a loan officer thing

Post: Is getting a GREAT deal unethical?

Brad L.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Manitowoc, WI
  • Posts 178
  • Votes 186

It wasn't you dealing solely with the elderly seller and taking advantage of him. 

1. You didn't negotiate. He gave you a price and you accepted.

2. There was a trustee and an attorney involved. If this was unethical on your part, then it was far more unethical on the part of both the trustee and attorney who are supposed to have the seller's best interests in mind.

3. A property is only worth what someone is willing to pay for it. He had one offer, for $5,000 below what you bought it for. Based on your post, no other offers. Had he thought it was worth more and wanted maximum value, his attorney and trustee should have recommended that he list with a realtor.

Don't worry about it.

Post: TRAPPED in a Bad House Hacking Situation due to COVID-19 Laws

Brad L.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Manitowoc, WI
  • Posts 178
  • Votes 186

@Miles Rose always a chance they turn into holdovers regardless of your 30-day notice, and at that point you’ll want all the documentation you can possibly have for eviction

Post: TRAPPED in a Bad House Hacking Situation due to COVID-19 Laws

Brad L.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Manitowoc, WI
  • Posts 178
  • Votes 186

Good on you for recognizing you made a mistake.

At the very least, you should mail (certified) them a notice to cure as I'm sure their smoking and noise disturbances are probably violating terms of your lease. Then you should continue sending notices as they continue to violate the lease. This should make things easier on you when the eviction moratoriums are gone.

Just not sure there's anything you can do to get them out right now besides cash for keys, but even then I doubt they'll take it since they know they have a potentially free & no consequence living arrangement for the foreseeable future.

Post: Self Storage how are you folks doing with rent collections ?

Brad L.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Manitowoc, WI
  • Posts 178
  • Votes 186

Small facility of 45 units in a low-ish income area, received all April rent.

Post: Los Angeles renters now have 12 months to settle back rent

Brad L.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Manitowoc, WI
  • Posts 178
  • Votes 186

Just based on how your post is worded, I read it as any rent that goes unpaid due to the current circumstances can be paid at any time over the following 12 months. If we assume rent is deferred for 90 days due to current circumstances, that would mean regular monthly payments would be due after those 90 days as well as tenants needing to work with landlords to determine how the 3 deferred payments will be made over 12 months.

Not in your market and just speculating based on your post.

Post: 1-4 Unit Commercial Mortgages

Brad L.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Manitowoc, WI
  • Posts 178
  • Votes 186

@Greg Miller

Have you discussed with your attorney about whether or not the mortgage being from you individually makes you more vulnerable to the LLC veil being pierced?

Post: Cozy.Co Problem .. Potential Major Flaw in their system

Brad L.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Manitowoc, WI
  • Posts 178
  • Votes 186
Originally posted by @Michael Mueller:
Originally posted by @Brad L.:

In Cozy’s defense, and I don’t even utilize their services, this could happen on any payment platform as the reversal wasn’t done by the platform itself but by the tenants financial institution. Just takes a shady tenant.

No, I think your are wrong. The problem is particular to Cozy (and similar platforms or intermediaries), as it was not a direct ACH transfer from the renter to the landlord, but rather Cozy probably did an ACH pull, followed by and ACH push from Cozy to the landlord. (Correct me if I'm wrong.) The landlord has several problems: 1. He did not pull from the tenant's account, therefore he cannot directly fight the reversal. He is dependent on Cozy fighting for him. Cozy's terms and conditions probably state that reversals from tenants results in reversals from the landlord's account. 2. It was an ACH pull from the tenant's account, which I'm speculating might be easier to reverse than a push. Even if the ACH from Cozy to the landlord was a push, Cozy is probably protected by their T&C that the landlord agreed to. 3. The landlord used a business account. Curious how the situation would have turned out had it been a personal account.

By contrast, a direct ACH payment is very difficult to reverse. The only reason to reverse an ACH payment that has a chance of success, is online fraud, i.e. the sender claims that he was not the one who authorized the payment. This can then be easily fought by showing the rental agreement, and showing that the sender is indeed the tenant. It would be very hard (impossible) for the tenant to argue that a third party fraudster hacked into his bank account and sent the money on behalf of the tenant to the tenant's landlord, which would make no sense, especially if the rent is indeed due. For disputed ACH payments, the receiving bank is obliged to investigate and consider evidence presented by the recipient (the landlord).

I anticipated this problem and therefore never use Cozy for rent collection. Another blatant problem is that last time I checked, a landlord cannot disable credit card payments, which are by magnitudes easier to reverse than ACH payments.

Using Cozy for rent collection is a bad, bad idea.

Also, many tenants who used Cozy and are unhappy for whatever reason, or for no reason at all, will google how to get their money back, many will find this thread, and know what to do.

"The problem is particular to Cozy (and similar platforms or intermediaries)".

That's exactly what I said. Any direct transfer app like Zelle, Cash app, etc. by which the funds are going directly from Tenant to Landlord I definitely would not consider to be a "payment platform". Do they transfer money? Sure, but that's where similarities end.

Literally just had a storage unit rent payment (ACH) reversed 20 days after I received, not on Cozy but on a different platform.

Don't really care enough to discuss any further, was just stating that in Cozy's defense, their platform isn't the only one that is vulnerable. Which is fact.

Post: Does the title company need my SSN to close???

Brad L.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Manitowoc, WI
  • Posts 178
  • Votes 186

Register of Deeds requires Buyer's SSN (and obviously Seller's) when recording the Deed in my municipality. Title company handles recording, so SSNs have to be provided to title company here.