@Ed Emmons Thank you for your feedback, but you took what I said out of context.
When I wrote, "From my research, mobile home parks might be a solution to the housing crisis, especially if a designer figures out how to make em look sexy.", I was not referring to buying because it's sexy, I was referring to owning them as they are, and making them more desirable by making them sexy aka more socially acceptable and desirable. That in turn would change the public perception of mobile home parks, making demand higher, thus making values higher.
That was not to imply that a property has to be sexy for me to invest, but that adding the sexy factor does in fact add value, and that the mobile park industry could use some innovation. I absolutely agree with you; simple misunderstanding.
Respectfully,
Blake
