I understand that for some reason you want to self manage. I do find it’s funny that you say managers are for people with more properties. I’d argue it’s the other way around. People who have more properties tend to eliminate the manager and bring it in house. Feel free to manage yourself and don’t consider thsi an argument against it, just things you may not have considered.
1) You’re going to “guess” at the market rent. You don’t have 500 or 1,000 other rentals in the area to judge market rent. There’s a 99% chance you’re going to ask to much and sit empty for an extra month or two. (Costing you more than hiring a PM.) or charge too little (Costing you more than hiring a PM.)
2) You are NOT going to know all the landlord laws. Do you have to keep the security deposit in a separate account? Do you have to pay interest? Is there a limit on how big it can be? Is there a limit on what you can charge as an application fee? How much notice to raise rent, non-renew, post notices or start evictions?mDo you have to accept the first applicant that qualifies?
3) Are you going to face fines for fair housing violations? (Making judgements based on family status, number of kids, medical animals, etc etc..)
4) When you get that first repair call 10pm Saturday night for a leaking roof or water heater do you have a trusted/dependable guy to call and get it fixed that night?
I'm not saying you can't do it, I'm just saying it's not worth doing unless you're unemployed and like doing it or your rents are high and your maintenance is low. In which case I would hire a PM to screen and place the tenant and then self mange. I do this with my only out of state property. It's a townhome with $3,500/mo rent. The HOA takes care of everything outside of the studs and I save enough to just replace anything that breaks and skip the repairs.