I only had one tenant that I had to sign a lease with myself, so take what I say with a grain of salt, but my system is very common to what you will find if you googled “how to screen tenants”. Good credit score, paycheck 3x rent, no evictions, etc. but the way I see it, there are also people who have had a bad year, and on their way to recover. So I will let one of my criteria’s fail and still accept a tenant (except evictions) as long as they provide some extra information to put me at ease. Most common example would be the low credit score. If they can show a history of it being good, and then it dropped for a period and now it’s trending up, with a good reason why it dropped (lost a job and had to use credit cards to pay for living expenses for a while) in my eyes it’s ok.
But you see more than 1 …no red but an orange flag… then I would give them an opportunity to provide extra information to cover for it.
Back to your situation. You definitely dodged a bullet, I agree with the first guy who said “all I needed to see is bad credit score” but only because that was just the beginning. All other stuff was too shady in my eyes. I would also say that there was another person providing info on how to check a shady w-2 employee… I think that was a great way to check, but I also don’t think it is landlords responsibility to go to that far to verify someone. After a conversation with the employer if you feel something is off, that’s all you need to close the file on that potential tenant and move one. It’s always better to skip a month of income to get a much better tenant that pays on time, is not a problem to deal with, communicates well and so on.