Quote from @Jesus Morales:
I'm curious to know if your perspective on your ideal markets to invest in have changed over time from when you first began investing to present day?
I think your question was whether or not what you look for in an ideal market has changed, not so much if your ideal market has changed over time (ie. the examples of how CA changed other states, like it has changed Idaho). I'm in the Boise market and it has changed significantly over the years. With that change, yes, I think some of the things I initially looked for in an investment have changed. I used to pass up properties that didn't have the highest cash flow, even if they were in a great area because I was chasing cash flow. But eventually we pivoted our strategy to focus on nicer neighborhoods that will hold their value, appreciate well and will be easy to sell when the time comes. These are also easy to rent and have higher quality tenants, but less cash flow on a monthly basis. Don't get me wrong, I still want to buy cash flowing properties, but I've changed my perspective on what a good deal is and what isn't. Boise (and surrounding areas) is still my ideal market because of the population demographics, growth prospects and fewer regulations than many markets of it size, which makes it more landlord friendly.