Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Account Closed

Account Closed has started 18 posts and replied 1513 times.

Post: Capex wipes out cash flow for a year?

Account ClosedPosted
  • Investor
  • Singapore
  • Posts 1,581
  • Votes 3,225

There is good reason to pay off mortgages earlier. It depends on what else you would do with the cash. If the cap rate return on a paid off property is risk adjusted better than what you would do elsewhere then nothing wrong in parking your capital in home equity. For example a 1%/50% rule home generates 6% cap rate. Risk adjusted that's not so bad for a predictable income stream. A fixed annuity might give similar but you are drawing down your capital. In the case of the house it keeps and grows equity.  For retired people paid of mortgages absolutely makes sense.

In the case of the OP if the 1300 rent generates 650 in actual cash flow after 50% expenses then his cap rate is about 4.5% after the mortgage is paid off. His risk is reduced as he has no mortgage payment. And rents will grow over time as will his equity. If he doesn't want to grow his portfolio anymore that is the correct end game.

Post: Asset Protection Plan

Account ClosedPosted
  • Investor
  • Singapore
  • Posts 1,581
  • Votes 3,225
Originally posted by @Nathan Gesner:

Guys, get real. What are the odds that you'll be sued for $2 million? How about $200,000? Your insurance company is designed to protect you. Actually, they're designed to make money. They give you $300,000 in liability coverage (or whatever your default amount is) because that's more than enough to handle 99.999762% of the lawsuits you'll face.

The most likely reason for being sued? Security deposit disputes. Your exposure is typically no more than 3x the deposit amount.

The odds of actually being sued? Probably like getting hit with lightning . . . twice. I manage almost 400 rentals with 12 years experience and haven't been sued once. I've asked BiggerPockets users and never get a response.

Even if you were sued, you have to lose. 

Even if you lose, it would have to be more than your insurance provider covers. Over 90% of all lawsuits are settled outside of court, which means your insurance company negotiates a payment that is below your liability threshold.

The risk of being sued is low. The risk of losing is low. The risk of losing more than insurance will cover is low.

Know the law. Obey the law. Treat people honestly and fairly. That will go farther than any insurance policy.

If you're still nervous, get a $2 million balloon policy and move on. Stop worrying about something that is unlikely to ever occur.

Exactly! I asked my PM who manages thousands of doors for dozens of years and he couldn't quote one example of an owner being sued for anything other than security deposit in small claims court. I am amazed by the paranoia of some investors. Where is it coming from? Is it from "asset protection" seminars and gurus? If you are that scared then just dont be a landlord. 

Post: Looking for cash flow markets recommendations

Account ClosedPosted
  • Investor
  • Singapore
  • Posts 1,581
  • Votes 3,225

@Leela Gutta Lots of cash flow markets out there. Sadly most of them the cash flows in the wrong direction.

Post: CA resident investing out of state

Account ClosedPosted
  • Investor
  • Singapore
  • Posts 1,581
  • Votes 3,225

I would think long and hard about your goals and why this is the best way to accomplish them. Buying one or two houses in the midwest or south, especially at todays prices, will not generate any real cash flow and no, you cannot manage them remotely. With the returns on rental properties so low, I personally dont think they are worth the risk and hassle any more unless you plan to scale to a large number of units and spend the time, energy and money to set up systems and processes to manage them efficiently. This is a lot easier said than done. Buying one local property even if cash flow is zero to negative today will probably yield you a better long term return. Or just buy into a syndication or put it in an index fund. 

All those options are better than buying OOS properties in overheated markets today. Just my opinion but I have owned and sold a number of such OOS properties. And I would never buy into the market at todays prices and rent ratios knowing the true expenses of owning them. 

Post: Am I going to lose my Earnest Money?

Account ClosedPosted
  • Investor
  • Singapore
  • Posts 1,581
  • Votes 3,225

In California at least Earnest money can be kept only if the seller can prove actual damages. If they put the house back on the market and it sells for the same or more, they cant really claim the Earnest money except maybe the carrying cost for the extra time. The earnest money is held in escrow and sellers cant just take it unilaterally. And like others have said, you should have had a finance contingency anyway.

Post: Selling foreign investment property

Account ClosedPosted
  • Investor
  • Singapore
  • Posts 1,581
  • Votes 3,225

First off its, border not boarder. A boarder is someone who rents a room from you. International taxation is very complex and you should not handle it on your own. Generally the US taxes all global income but you do get credit for taxes you paid abroad. How much depends on the country, whether there are tax treaties, your tax residency status etc etc. Im not a CPA but lived abroad long enough to have generated 300 page tax returns (that is not an exaggeration, one year my tax return was really 300 pages long).

Post: THE UNIVERSE WORKS IN FUNNY WAYS SOMETIMES

Account ClosedPosted
  • Investor
  • Singapore
  • Posts 1,581
  • Votes 3,225
Originally posted by @Natalie Schanne:

@Jason Malabute - most people I meet who aren’t doing deals are too conservative with their underwriting. Or not trying to find any wholesale or soliciting off market deals (either driving for dollars, posting on Facebook pages, calling places for rent and seeing if they want to sell as is). Mainly, if you put in like 8% vacancy and 10% PM and 10% maintenance / capex and $$$ rehab, and very conservative rent, you can make any deal look bad. Is it really a bad deal or are you making it look like a bad deal? I blew my rent estimates out of the water because the rental market is so hot where I am right now.

In reality those assumptions are actually conservative! Assume even higher expenses. Anything less than 50% of rent (not incl mortgage) on rents of around 1K is just not going to happen in the long run. 

Post: Separate Bank Accounts Per Property

Account ClosedPosted
  • Investor
  • Singapore
  • Posts 1,581
  • Votes 3,225

@Nicholaos Koufoudakis I have no idea where people get this irrational fear of being sued. You dont need one LLC per property or even an LLC at all if you are the sole owner. You have insurance on each with liability coverage right? Add a 1m or 2m umbrella on top and you are totally protected from lawsuits which are very low probability to begin with. Each llc will have annual fees and record keeping and its own tax return. What a nightmare! I'm sure your lawyer is salivating at the ongoing fees!

Post: How do I buy another investment property with my circumstance

Account ClosedPosted
  • Investor
  • Singapore
  • Posts 1,581
  • Votes 3,225
Originally posted by @Jayden Hamilton:

There's no way I need to partner with someone to get more deals done. I have a property paid off in full worth 160k, and I have 100k liquid cash in my savings account. I have a duplex producing rent, but I owe 115k on the mortgage. I'm not sure how I'm that great of risk in the lender's eyes. There has to be a way around this, the rich get richer, and their debt to income ratios have to be way higher than mine, but they're still getting loans? How does that work?

First of all  billionaires operate at another level so lets not compare. For large multis (like 200 unit apartments etc) it is actually quite common for banks to want to see net worth of the sponsor equal to the loan amount they are asking for. This is in addition to the underwriting of the income numbers from the apartment. Plus there are reserves etc banks will demand. Now you may feel rich with a net worth of $250K but in the world of commercial real estate you dont even register as a tiny dot. So I dont know what size loans you are talking about but in your world debt to income is most certainly a real limiter. You can certainly leverage your equity and cash to buy properties but probably no more than $1M worth, assuming you have income to support a 4-5K/month mortgage payment.

Post: issues with property management and concerns

Account ClosedPosted
  • Investor
  • Singapore
  • Posts 1,581
  • Votes 3,225
Originally posted by @Prash Manohar:

@Account Closed what is first turn quote? didnt follow

A turn quote is what you get when a tenant leaves and the property has to be turned over for a new tenant.  You will likely be shocked by the total. This is the part of OOS turnkey investing that nobody talks about when trying to sell you a property.