Quote from @Jeff P.:
I will try to keep this brief.
I have 100% equity in a single-family rental outside of Detroit Michigan. I am in the process of doing a cash out refi. The house appraised for a little more than what I expected. The lender's representative and I had spoken about 75% LTV all during this scenario.
Now yesterday, I was surprised with a lender estimate that was at 70% LTV. When I requested she run the numbers at 75% LTV, she then told me that there was a cap on the amount I could get (amounts to under 75%), and I would also have to pay points for that loan (75% LTV scenarios were at 0 points). This is several thousand dollars less than I would've gotten at the full 75% LTV, but she claims it is a Fannie Mae requirement?
Why this wasn’t disclosed long ago, I have no idea. Is she correct in saying this? The difference in the appraised amount versus the expected amount was not gigantic. However, I don’t intend on refinancing this property again - possibly ever. So I would prefer to pull all cash out that I can this time.
TIA for opinions/info.
Can only be 2 reasons well 3 if we count incompetence by the loan officer.
1. Compensating factors ie. weaker credit score, weaker reserves, weaker DTI
2. Lender overlays - Some lenders will only write loans up to 70% for "risk" reasons and decrease the likelihood they would have to buy the loan back from fannie or freddie.
3. Loan officer incompetence - sounds like they quoted you on 75% LTV but once the underwriters got a hold of it, they restructured.
Without having the convo myself, Id be willing to bet its a combo of 2 and 3