Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Alex R.

Alex R. has started 17 posts and replied 128 times.

Post: %2 rental rule does not work

Alex R.Posted
  • Bakersfield, CA
  • Posts 128
  • Votes 7

When talking about 12% or 24% return cash ON CASH, I guess you are making the assumption that property is purchased and paid off full in cash.

What about a scenario where you put the 20% down payment and finance the rest with a low interest rate that is available in the market nowadays?

In that case ROI will be higher as your down payment was only a fraction of purchase price.

Post: %2 rental rule does not work

Alex R.Posted
  • Bakersfield, CA
  • Posts 128
  • Votes 7
Originally posted by Bryan Hennen:
It does if you are in the right market. Check this out. http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/1217-E-Barrett-Ave-Madison-Heights-MI-48071/24654762_zpid/ This is a nice home in a working class Detroit suburb. Nice neighborhood, low crime and low taxes. The home gets 3%.

I used to live in Toledo, Ohio and worked in Ann arbor, MI.

This seems to be a good deal if Madison Heights is not a war zone or drug dealing gangs territory.

I heard in Detroit there are plenty of houses that are vacant and abandoned. State will appreciate you much if you take over some, so those properties will not be their problems anymore.

Post: %2 rental rule does not work

Alex R.Posted
  • Bakersfield, CA
  • Posts 128
  • Votes 7
Originally posted by Scott W.:
in northern cali, it's very possible rentals are not profitable. so why not flip?

search on here how to do the 50% rule. you can also invest in other states if cali won't cut it for a rental.

Technically speaking, bakersfield is in California central valley not NorCal.
Even Sacramento which is even more north than san francisco, is still a part of central valley.

And as a beginner real estate investor, I want to purchase properties within 15 minutes drive max, let alone in a different state.

Post: %2 rental rule does not work

Alex R.Posted
  • Bakersfield, CA
  • Posts 128
  • Votes 7
Originally posted by Jon Klaus:
My DFW SFRs average over 2%. My average rent is $925. No class D or war zones.

Jon

I will assume when you purchase the property, your offer is 50 % of what property is really worth.

if this is true, how do you get these offers accepted

Post: %2 rental rule does not work

Alex R.Posted
  • Bakersfield, CA
  • Posts 128
  • Votes 7

I am looking up some houses to fix and hold (rent) and I am doing some analysis, but there is absolutely no way to get a deal which fits the %2 rule.

Here is an example:

http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/2911-Nelson-St-Bakersfield-CA-93305/18892546_zpid/

This is a foreclosed property selling for $109,500. Let’s say you put an offer of 95 K and you are lucky enough to have it accepted.

2% of 95k = $1900

That is a far stretch from Average $900 - $1100 rent for similar houses in that neighborhood.

Or we can do the match another way: Let’s say we already have someone who has the money and wants to rent this place for $ 1100

In order to make the 2% rule work, our offer should be $55,000 (compared to the seller asking price of 109k) this offer doesn’t stand a chance.

First and foremost congratulations on this great achievement.

I just joined in january as well and I am very happy i found this website.

What i like to see here is a mobile version of the site or at least making the forum accessible through tapatalk

Post: Newbie from CT

Alex R.Posted
  • Bakersfield, CA
  • Posts 128
  • Votes 7
Originally posted by Tom V.:
Originally posted by Alex R.:
Originally posted by Tom V.:

There were many other positive aspects to the deal as well, but I still feel we could've done better.

But it works, for now.

What would you have done differently, if you were doing it again ?

Post: The Top 5 Landlord Mistakes

Alex R.Posted
  • Bakersfield, CA
  • Posts 128
  • Votes 7
Originally posted by Richard Warren:
Having unrealistic expectations about cash flow. Believing the realtor or seller when he says that the property has positive cash flow. To them it is positive as long as it covers PITI, which totally ignores all of the other expenses.

What are those other expenses besides PITI and maintenance costs ?

Post: Estimating a listed property value using online resources

Alex R.Posted
  • Bakersfield, CA
  • Posts 128
  • Votes 7

Thank you for your reply Joshua

I was thinking of using these website as a rough estimate to make a decision whether go and see a property or not.

Because within my criteria sometimes many properties become available and I need to filter some and then proceed with the remaining.

Post: Newbie from CT

Alex R.Posted
  • Bakersfield, CA
  • Posts 128
  • Votes 7
Originally posted by Tom V.:

We purchased a 3 family multi for 155k with only 20k down.

Thanks for having me!

Congratulations on this great deal Tom. Considering it was your first deal makes it even more exciting.

I like to know what is the interest rate on your 155k loan and how did you finance it