Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Insurance
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago,

User Stats

374
Posts
27
Votes
Ben C.
  • Metuchen, NJ
27
Votes |
374
Posts

Vacant policy vs builders risk

Ben C.
  • Metuchen, NJ
Posted
Hello, Can someone shed some light on this for me. What is the difference between a vacant home policy and a builders risk policy? I am deciding between a gut Reno/addition and a tear down to the basement. My insurance agent told me the vacant home policy is applicable if I go the first route and builders risk if I go the second route (tear down to basement foundation). Do you agree? I will be GC and hiring the subs to do the work in order to save $. Thoughts? Thank you!

Loading replies...