Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Wholesaling
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago,

User Stats

415
Posts
187
Votes
Mike Schorah
  • Rental Property Investor
187
Votes |
415
Posts

Why not absentee instead of driving for dollars?

Mike Schorah
  • Rental Property Investor
Posted

I noticed that about 15% of my driving for dollars list is absentees.

I also noticed that half of my driving for dollars leads and my best leads come from absentees.

So why not just market to absentee owner? Not sure why throwing owner occupied-s in there is a good strategy when they’re usually just upset and demand the highest price (unless you’re doing sub 2 and not all cash).

I don’t think it’s a quantity issue either. I’ve marketed to 3,000 driving for dollars prospects in the last 2 years.

Loading replies...