Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Legal & Legislation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 6 days ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

101
Posts
13
Votes
Peter Lee
  • Developer
  • Los Angeles, CA
13
Votes |
101
Posts

Prescriptive easement question in California

Peter Lee
  • Developer
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

I own a commercial property in Los Angeles area and theres a vehicular path that runs across the neighbor's property indicated in red arrows into our lot. The path has existed for at least 20 yr. Continuously used by us and the previous owners of the property in blue.

Question is how feasible is this to qualify for a prescriptive easement? There's no record of it in the title report which is odd since it looks like it is there by design since there's a curb cut and the existing fence was designed with a gate.

Yes, I know this should've been caught during acquisition but not having this is not the end of the world, just inconvenient.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

43,020
Posts
63,513
Votes
Jay Hinrichs
#1 All Forums Contributor
  • Lender
  • Lake Oswego OR Summerlin, NV
63,513
Votes |
43,020
Posts
Jay Hinrichs
#1 All Forums Contributor
  • Lender
  • Lake Oswego OR Summerlin, NV
Replied
Quote from @Matt Devincenzo:

This is my perspective as an engineer/survey consultant...

The rights associated with a prescriptive easement exist only in 'concept' and statue. It isn't until one of two things happen that they're obvious and apparent. First option is you obtain a signed document from the adjacent owner acknowledging the condition and essentially granting you the easement...obtaining the easement negates the need for prescription since it is now 'of record'. Or you file a lawsuit to perfect those rights via the court, and then a judge considers the statutory requirements and awards you access via a judgement. 

My exposure to PE has been on projects being developed. One was a neighbor making the claim, which they went too far by saying they owned the property...you can't deprive someone of the property itself...but they could likely have won on the PE claim. Instead my client negotiated something else (a license agreement I think). 

The other two projects had old PE listed in title. One appeared to have been voluntarily entered into, and the document discussed the condition and timing etc and how as of the execution there was now an easement superseding any historical claims. The other was a recorded judgement indicating the extent of the PE claim and the obligations for each party. Both were from 50+ years ago, if I remember correctly the late 40's and the mid 60's.


In my experience with this stuff  mutual agreement is by far the best route and license agreement works very well as stated above .  I dont think just a curb cut and fence situation will carry the day.. but the use might.
business profile image
JLH Capital Partners

Loading replies...