Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Market Trends & Data
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

22
Posts
12
Votes
Adam Frantz
  • Investor
  • Shoreline, WA
12
Votes |
22
Posts

Southwest Drought concerns

Adam Frantz
  • Investor
  • Shoreline, WA
Posted

I keep hearing folks talking about hot markets in CA, AZ, and Las Vegas. I left CA about 10 years ago due to concerns about water. I am confused though why many of these areas are on the brink of having water shut off and maybe power if the dam can’t run and yet they are still growing markets with high housing prices. If you are investing for the future, are these not concerns of yours? What am I missing?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,135
Posts
2,641
Votes
Matt Devincenzo
  • Investor
  • Clairemont, CA
2,641
Votes |
3,135
Posts
Matt Devincenzo
  • Investor
  • Clairemont, CA
Replied

70-80% of the Southwest's and specifically Socal water use is irrigation for farms. That means even a 50% reduction in urban use only correlates to a maximum of 15% saved. 

You will see a food shortage due to fallowing farms before you will see an issue related to urban water use. There are at least 10M residents in an urban environment that would be impacted by shutoffs, compared to several hundred thousand farmers...and you can even prioritize those for food security vs hay and processing production. 

Total urban water use decreased for nearly 20 years even while the actual number of residents has increased. So the actual solution and the concern isn't for residential users its farms, and water purveyors. I think urban water use will be further offset by reuse programs for drinking water, which can easily provide a 50% reduction in imported water.


Loading replies...