Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Market Trends & Data
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

22
Posts
12
Votes
Adam Frantz
  • Investor
  • Shoreline, WA
12
Votes |
22
Posts

Southwest Drought concerns

Adam Frantz
  • Investor
  • Shoreline, WA
Posted

I keep hearing folks talking about hot markets in CA, AZ, and Las Vegas. I left CA about 10 years ago due to concerns about water. I am confused though why many of these areas are on the brink of having water shut off and maybe power if the dam can’t run and yet they are still growing markets with high housing prices. If you are investing for the future, are these not concerns of yours? What am I missing?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,126
Posts
2,640
Votes
Matt Devincenzo
  • Investor
  • Clairemont, CA
2,640
Votes |
3,126
Posts
Matt Devincenzo
  • Investor
  • Clairemont, CA
Replied

70-80% of the Southwest's and specifically Socal water use is irrigation for farms. That means even a 50% reduction in urban use only correlates to a maximum of 15% saved. 

You will see a food shortage due to fallowing farms before you will see an issue related to urban water use. There are at least 10M residents in an urban environment that would be impacted by shutoffs, compared to several hundred thousand farmers...and you can even prioritize those for food security vs hay and processing production. 

Total urban water use decreased for nearly 20 years even while the actual number of residents has increased. So the actual solution and the concern isn't for residential users its farms, and water purveyors. I think urban water use will be further offset by reuse programs for drinking water, which can easily provide a 50% reduction in imported water.


Loading replies...