Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Managing Your Property
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 3 days ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

3
Posts
0
Votes

Charging a flat percentage of rental income makes NO sense

Posted

Flat-rate billing based on rent makes zero sense for most property management companies.
You charge up to 15% of rent regardless of how much work a property requires? That might be simple and easy, but it doesn't seem smart and it's definitely not fair.

You’ve got one client renting $3,000/month units with stable tenants and another at $700/unit constantly turning over, submitting work orders, and dragging down your team’s time. Why should the harder client pay less than the easier ones. In some cases, your worst clients are probably costing you money.

I’m curious how others are handling this.

  • Are you sticking with flat-rate and just eating the cost of problem clients?

  • Have you found ways to implement hybrid models (low base + billable hours)?

  • What are the biggest headaches in moving toward a more precise billing model?

  • How do you explain it to owners in a way that makes sense?

Let’s hear it — especially if you disagree. I think this is one of the most important (and overlooked) levers in making a PM business profitable

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

9,007
Posts
5,678
Votes
Drew Sygit
#1 Managing Your Property Contributor
  • Property Manager
  • Royal Oak, MI
5,678
Votes |
9,007
Posts
Drew Sygit
#1 Managing Your Property Contributor
  • Property Manager
  • Royal Oak, MI
Replied

@Stephen Schroeder The Flat Fee model was really created for handling Class A rentals. 

With Class A rentals a PMC rarely has nonpayment issues, so rarely evictions and many tenants take care of their own minor maintenance issues. 

When you see a PMC offering guarantees to cover eviction costs and such, you can bet most of their portfolio is Class A rentals. 

Class B rentals are a little trickier, but can still support a Flat Fee model is a PMC uses virtual assistants to cut their costs, so they can remain profitable.

The REAL trouble starts when PMCs try to apply the Flat Fee model to Class C and below rentals. The properties & tenants require way too much attention to allow a PMC to be profitable solely on flat fees. 

It's interesting that one of the biggest franchise PMCs in the country (who just bought/merged a big competitor) significanlty raised their flat fee rates last year.

Wonder why they did that?

business profile image
Logical Property Management.
5.0 stars
1 Review

Loading replies...