Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Managing Your Property
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

382
Posts
123
Votes
Mary lou L.
  • Investor
  • Wichita Falls, TX
123
Votes |
382
Posts

Providing security cameras on vacant properties.

Mary lou L.
  • Investor
  • Wichita Falls, TX
Posted

Do you have recommendations on a system or company who provides this?

I am considering adding this to services offered to clients, out of area and local, these properties are vacant, and no utilities.

I am thinking of purchasing a system, putting it in, and removing it once property is rented/sold.

I’ve seen stand alone solar cameras with cellular, im researching cost, and I want to provide access to owner if they wish to view the property remotely. 

As far as cost, I’m looking at initial set up, then monthly until property no longer needs the system. 

Tl;dr am looking for a security system that can work without wifi or electricity at a location. 

Thank you! 

Loading replies...