Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Marketing Your Property
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago, 05/10/2016

User Stats

133
Posts
49
Votes
Jibu V.
  • Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
49
Votes |
133
Posts

Direct Mail in Philadelphia - Saturated?

Jibu V.
  • Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
Posted

From almost every recommendation I've seen, it sounds like direct mail is the best way to generate leads for rehabbing and wholesaling.  My concern is this:

Philadelphia (in and around) is flooded with bandit signs.  I am presuming that it is also flooded with direct mail.  What kind of success are people currently having with direct mail in Philly?  

I hope to start off with 1000 mail pieces per month.  The main thing holding me back right now is a belief that the Philly market may be saturated with these mailings (sounds like everyone is buying a listsource list and marketing to vacant owners "with equity") and sellers are using it to their advantage to have investors bid against each other and make deals less appealing.  Am I thinking about this the wrong way?

Thanks in advance for any feedback.

Loading replies...