Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Marketing Your Property
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

130
Posts
44
Votes
P. Martin
  • Residential Real Estate Agent
  • San antonio, TX
44
Votes |
130
Posts

Bad proofreading or clever ploy?

P. Martin
  • Residential Real Estate Agent
  • San antonio, TX
Posted

I knew as soon as I opened my mailbox today, what this letter was. 

I also immediately noticed a glaring error...

So, what do you think? Was this a sloppy mistake? Or a subversive marketing twist in order to get people to open the letter? Hmmmmm

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

57
Posts
27
Votes
Darrie W. Bennett
  • Real Estate Broker
  • San Francisco Bay Area, CA
27
Votes |
57
Posts
Darrie W. Bennett
  • Real Estate Broker
  • San Francisco Bay Area, CA
Replied

I think mistake.  Reason ... because if it was intentional, the sender would be taking a big risk, because the first thing I would think to myself is, " If this person missed this, he/she is probably not detail-oriented enough for me to want to work with".

Loading replies...