Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Marketing Your Property
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 7 years ago,

User Stats

1,158
Posts
655
Votes
John Horner
Pro Member
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Columbus, OH
655
Votes |
1,158
Posts

What is the best direct mail for over age 65, high equity, owner occupants?

John Horner
Pro Member
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Columbus, OH
Posted

In the past all of my direct mail has been to high equity Absentee Owners. I started with yellow letters but found that Postcards really work best to reduce tire kickers and promote motivation.

I am trying a new list and I'd like your opinion on what is the best form of direct mail.

I have a list of 1800 owner occupants, age 65 and over, 70% equity or more and only in the prime zips.

I am thinking because of the higher end area that a typed letter is best, but what is the best message for this group?

Thanks all!

  • John Horner
  • Loading replies...