Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate News & Current Events
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

154
Posts
114
Votes
Jeff Petsche
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Yorba Linda, CA
114
Votes |
154
Posts

Thoughts on the New Financial Choice Act and It's Impact?

Jeff Petsche
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Yorba Linda, CA
Posted

With the new passing of a bill called the Financial Choice Act, which scales back or eliminates many of the post-crisis banking rules under Dodd Frank, I wanted to know what other BP members thought about this topic, and how they feel this will impact real estate as a whole, and specifically in their markets.

Many argue the Choice Act would leave the U.S. economy vulnerable to another financial crisis, and I don't think they are wrong. Loosing guidelines with lending laws is what got us into trouble back in 2008-2009, and yet it appears we could be headed there again.

Being a CA real estate Broker and looking at investing OOS for long term buy/hold properties (Small multi-family communities up to 15 units and/or possibly SFRs) for positive cash flow, I don't feel certain markets where I'm looking to invest (Ohio, Indiana, Oklahoma, Utah, Tennessee) will be as impacted when the SHIFT and DOWNSWING hits, as it will in BOOM/BUST states like CA, NV, AZ and FL.

Thoughts?

Here is the an article on this topic:  http://www.npr.org/2017/06/08/532036374/house-passes-bill-aimed-at-reversing-dodd-frank-financial-regulations

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,142
Posts
1,140
Votes
Jeff Filali
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Broken Arrow, OK
1,140
Votes |
1,142
Posts
Jeff Filali
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Broken Arrow, OK
Replied

Will be happy to see DF eliminated or at least cut out a lot of it. Fully understand its original intent, but all it accomplished was making it harder for the small guys to operate who want to offer seller financing. You can still do it, but a lot more regulations and cost involved. For someone like me who pays cash for properties, it makes no sense. Its impossible for me to overleverage. It makes no sense that I can have unlimited RTO/LTO deals, but have to go through red tape to offer clients seller financing. IMO, RTO/LTO are a lot worse deal for the clients. Many clients don't understand the terminology, and think their monthly rent is paying for the house, but most of the time their just paying inflated "down payments" in order to have the option to buy the property. At least for those offering legitimate seller financing, the clients are actually buying the property from day one. Just my 2 cents, which is worth about 1 penny!! :-)

Loading replies...