Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

46
Posts
19
Votes
Char Tovar
  • Investor
  • Gig Harbor, WA
19
Votes |
46
Posts

Need help avoiding the "Biggest Mistakes" list on BP

Char Tovar
  • Investor
  • Gig Harbor, WA
Posted

I have a triplex under contract in Omaha, NE (an out of state deal) that seems to pencil out fairly well. Problem is I just found there was an error in the original information and the property was built in 1884 making it almost 140 years old. I don't own anything this aged and never thought I would, it is not consistent with my investing strategy but the numbers really would be pretty good (not great). Many people have told me that "this is not an issue if the property has been taken care of". I have to say I am really stressing out about it, especially when it is well known that inspections don't always uncover all of the issues in a property. Any words of wisdom (or warning) from the BP group on this? 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,622
Posts
1,498
Votes
Zeke Liston
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Columbus, OH
1,498
Votes |
1,622
Posts
Zeke Liston
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Columbus, OH
Replied
Originally posted by @Char Tovar:

I have a triplex under contract in Omaha, NE (an out of state deal) that seems to pencil out fairly well. Problem is I just found there was an error in the original information and the property was built in 1884 making it almost 140 years old. I don't own anything this aged and never thought I would, it is not consistent with my investing strategy but the numbers really would be pretty good (not great). Many people have told me that "this is not an issue if the property has been taken care of". I have to say I am really stressing out about it, especially when it is well known that inspections don't always uncover all of the issues in a property. Any words of wisdom (or warning) from the BP group on this? 

 Hi Char, most of my properties here in Columbus, OH are over 90-100 years old. I would agree that if the property has been well maintained, you're likely in good condition. Just make sure to do your due diligence and really study the report. Ask the seller if they have had/know of any issues. Best of luck! 

business profile image
Verti
5.0 stars
34 Reviews

Loading replies...