Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago,

User Stats

122
Posts
11
Votes
Keith W.
  • Investor
  • Massachusetts
11
Votes |
122
Posts

Is a wrap mortgage and subject to the same thing?

Keith W.
  • Investor
  • Massachusetts
Posted

In my research on the "Subject to" financing technique, some are referring it to a "Wrap-Around Mortgage". 

My understanding of "Subject to" is that we would create an agreement that we would be taking over the payments in exchange for control of the deed, etc.

When looking a the "Wraparound Mortgage", specifically, it looks like there is a spread between what is paid to the seller and his mortgage lender.  

In other words, in a "subject to deal", if the mortgage payment is $1000K per month we pay that amount. On the other hand, for "wrap mortgage" we're paying the $1000K plus an additional amount based on an agreed to purchase price. 

Is this correct, or are these just two various ways it can done? 

Loading replies...