Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 7 years ago,

User Stats

97
Posts
44
Votes
Brian Dickerson
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Delray Beach, FL
44
Votes |
97
Posts

Should I be concerned about this deal?

Brian Dickerson
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Delray Beach, FL
Posted

In contract for a duplex which is one of our first deals. It currently has tenants, one month to month other on a lease.

This is in upstate NY and the city requires a certificate of occupancy (with an inspection from the city before issuing) for rental properties. Once we ask about it under contract, we learn the seller let it lapse a couple months ago.

We try to make the deal contingent upon them obtaining a new c of o. No dice. We change the contingency to say that WE will pay to obtain the c of o unless the inspection for it reveals over $4,000 worth of deficiencies. Still a no from the seller.

From what we could see after a home inspection , it would cost less than $1000 to make the necessary repairs to be compliant for the c of o. The home inspection revealed probably about 6-8000 of total repairs that need to be done but very few related to the requirements for the C of O. We asked for an old electric panel to be replaced & service on the furnaces and they conceded that to us.

Supposedly the seller got another offer above our price & without any contingencies after accepting ours. But then why would they concede anything to us? Why not just say no to everything and kill the deal so they can get the alleged better offer?

In addition, weve asked multiple times for rent rolls and maintenance records from the listing agent to no avail. Our agent contacted the property manager directly to ask for these items and they very rudely said it's all confidential. Then the seller agent accused our agent of being unethical trying to obtain the docs.

I get an uneasy feeling about this deal now, as if they're trying to hide something. On the surface the #s look good still, unless of course there's something we haven't caught.

I'm still a newbie so looking for input on what you all think.

Loading replies...