Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 14 years ago,

User Stats

8,794
Posts
4,382
Votes
Bryan Hancock#4 Off Topic Contributor
  • Investor
  • Round Rock, TX
4,382
Votes |
8,794
Posts

Foreclosure Notice - What is Sufficient?

Bryan Hancock#4 Off Topic Contributor
  • Investor
  • Round Rock, TX
Posted

So we had our monthly auction in Texas yesterday and one of the deals we had tied up got auctioned off. Apparently the seller had been served notice at the property he was selling to us instead of his homestead. My coaching client had been to the bank with the seller (local regional bank) and they flat-out told them that they weren't going to foreclose.

We are still sorting out all of the details, but we think that the bank backdated the notice and sent it certified mail a week or so before the auction. The date on the letter was May 10th, which would have been sufficient notice if it was mailed in a timely fashion. The trouble is:

1. It was mailed to the wrong address so he didn't get it until the 28th
2. They listed the county on the notice as Travis County instead of Williamson County
3. The bank told my client verbally they weren't going to foreclose on the property with the seller present so he didn't review the letter thoroughly

We also found out that the note was sold recently to a private lender after we got the title commitment. Apparently the commitment runs 2 weeks behind so this slipped through the cracks. It seems like the hard money lender is trying to get the deed fraudulenty by backdating the date it was sent. The timestamp on the certified letter should be the smoking gun, but our attorney seems to think notice getting filed at the wrong address should be sufficient for us to undo things. The last gasp attempt would be to trump up the fact that the wrong county was on the notice...which we didn't see a copy of until today.

Does anyone have experience with banks doing this sort of thing? The whole thing stinks to high heaven. We think that the bank had a buddy in on the thing with some sort of kickback arrangement. The notice was purposefully mailed to the wrong address 3 times and then to his real address to shorten the window to cure the default OR was backdated to try to meet the 21-day requirement. The trustee also talked to the seller's daughter (he doesn't speak very good english) this morning and she claimes he seemed very nervous...smacks of something fishy.

Thoughts? Our attorney is fighting the thing and there is roughly $100k in red meat in the deal so I hope we can get the thing fixed.

Loading replies...