Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 14 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1,991
Posts
1,136
Votes
Sharad M.
  • Carlsbad, CA
1,136
Votes |
1,991
Posts

Location, Location, Location vs. Numbers, Numbers, Numbers!!!!!

Sharad M.
  • Carlsbad, CA
Posted

What would you choose - a 20% cash on cash return in a decent neighborhood or 35% cash on cash return in not the best neighborhood? Everything else being equal.

If you could also explain why you would choose one over the other.

Thanks!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,169
Posts
123
Votes
Frank Adams
  • Loveland, CO
123
Votes |
1,169
Posts
Frank Adams
  • Loveland, CO
Replied

Great answers above, I really liked Rich's. When I was doing buy and holds I noticed that the spread on those returns was never that far, the DIFFERENCE between 20% and 35% is NOT 15%, it's 75%.

I knew that the hassle, work and vacancy on turnovers was much less on the higher end places. Higher end tenants were ALWAYS stable enough to see the value in a MINIMUM TWO YEAR lease. And once they were there for 2 they stayed an average of FIVE. Regardless of the difference in monthly cash flow the difference in NOT painting, NOT carpeting, NOT replacing broken screens and NOT doing other stuff that is easier to do in an empty unit more than makes up for it.

I never wanted a place that my wife would be uncomfortable living in, and I knew that eventually I would be the one selling and I was always the one leasing. People who are interested in a crappy place are going to be crappy tenants.

Frank

Loading replies...