Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago,

User Stats

33
Posts
14
Votes
Xavier G.
  • Tomball, TX
14
Votes |
33
Posts

Overly conservative in my numbers for North West Houston area?

Xavier G.
  • Tomball, TX
Posted

Hi Biggerpocket,

I am trying to make sense of my rental numbers for SFRs in the Northwest Houston area and I can't seem to make them work so I am wondering if I am just looking at it differently from everybody else and am too conservative in my estimates or just completely looking in the wrong area ... Basically looking for feedback!

In order to get a rent of $1200/$1300 a month, I would expect a house in the $100-150k, approx. 1800 ft2:

- Insurance/HOA/Tax of about 30% rent (tax being the biggest hit at rates of 2.5-3%)

 - Vacancy, Maintenance/Cap Ex and Property Mgt another 30% of rent

Even if I were to pay $100k for the house (20% down, 30 year loan at 5%) including rehab, I would barely cash flow.

If the house was actually worth $150 but still paid $100k for it, I would now be $100 negative cash flow due to taxes.

Tax/Vacancy/Cap Ex & maint/Property mgt are the major hitters. In order to reduce tax, I would have to find a house that is actually worth less than $100k but then I don't think I would get $1200 rent for it. If I look for a house that may get $1600+ in rent, then the house value has gone up quite a bit and taxes/insurance have followed so it's still not cash flowing.

So, is it just that I am overly conservative with Vacancy, Maintenance/Cap Ex and Property Mgt or just that there are houses that are not worth much but have high rents and I'm just missing them?

Loading replies...