Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 1 year ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

78
Posts
45
Votes
Phil Avery
  • Investor
  • Houston, TX
45
Votes |
78
Posts

Investment in a Tight Market: Navigating Negative Cash Flow for Long-Term Gain

Phil Avery
  • Investor
  • Houston, TX
Posted

Hello everyone,

I'm navigating the challenging waters of finding cash-flowing properties in my market and came across a deal that's got me pondering. This property shows a negative cash flow and cash-on-cash ROI from the get-go. However, the future looks bright with a promising pro forma cap rate and the potential for significant equity growth and improved returns down the line. I'm considering this with only a 5% initial investment.

Given the tight market, I'm leaning towards a strategy where I aim to break even (or close to it) for the first year or so, with hopes of refinancing when the market conditions improve. I've heard the golden rule: 'Never invest in a property that starts off losing money.' Yet, I also believe in adapting strategies to fit the current market dynamics.

What's your take on this approach? Is it too risky, or could it be a viable strategy considering the market's state? Would love to hear your insights and any personal experiences you might have with similar situations.

On a side note, I'm currently renting a house for $1425. I could not see an obvious benefit to House hacking this property as opposed to renting both units out? What I am missing here? Seems more like a preference rather than a way to lower expenses. I'd own the property either way, its more inconvenient for me to House hack, and I'm not seeing the primary benefit. If anyone can clear that up for me too it would be appreciated! 

Thanks again! 

  • Phil Avery
  • Loading replies...