Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 1 year ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

38
Posts
18
Votes
Lisa H.
  • Investor
18
Votes |
38
Posts

Analyze this Property

Lisa H.
  • Investor
Posted

Lets say you aquire an inherited property that's paid off. It rents for $3300 a month but with taxes, insurance, HOA, PM, maintenance and vacancy % expenses, it only cash flows $1950. Sounds great but it's worth 600k-650k. It's only paying out about 3.8%. The house is an an A/B class area. Very little chance you will have to deal with evictions with the quality of tenants. It borders LA county but is in Ventura county.

Would you continue to rent it? Sell it? Reinvest it? Obviously taxes play a part. Not sure about all the tax implications. All ideas, thoughts and opinions welcomed! 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

113
Posts
57
Votes
Steven S.
  • Specialist
  • LA & Ventura
57
Votes |
113
Posts
Steven S.
  • Specialist
  • LA & Ventura
Replied
Quote from @Lisa H.:

Lets say you aquire an inherited property that's paid off. It rents for $3300 a month but with taxes, insurance, HOA, PM, maintenance and vacancy % expenses, it only cash flows $1950. Sounds great but it's worth 600k-650k. It's only paying out about 3.8%. The house is an an A/B class area. Very little chance you will have to deal with evictions with the quality of tenants. It borders LA county but is in Ventura county.

Would you continue to rent it? Sell it? Reinvest it? Obviously taxes play a part. Not sure about all the tax implications. All ideas, thoughts and opinions welcomed! 

Ya 3.8% return if you use the current value, appreciation has been massive over the last 2-3 years. You are lucky you are on the owner-side of things since that means your property is worth that much even though it produces that low of CF. Welcome to the world of buying 2-4 unit rental properties in Los Angeles in 2024.

If the property was acquired 7+ years ago, your returns from appreciation will be massive & unmatched by renting this out. A better metric for you to evaluate rental property performance is to take the annual CF and divide it by your all-in costs (not the current value) on the project so you can see what yields you are getting from your past-spent dollars. Just add up the original purchase, add any renovations/construction/improvements, and divide $23,400 by that number to get your annual CF yield %.

If it's 10-15%+ annually, you might want to hold it since that yield on your current cash is hard to beat. If it's closer to 5%, I'd say capture the appreciation dollars by selling, and 1031 the funds to a slightly larger project

Loading replies...