Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 1 year ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

6
Posts
0
Votes

Title company refusal to release “lease back funds” to buyer

Posted

Has anyone ever dealt with a title company refusing to release the funds on an agreed upon lease back. So both seller & buyer agreed on a (residential temporary lease agreement) so that the seller will have time to move our after closing. The lease states 10k will be held as a deposit by the buyer & if the seller/tenant does not move out, the seller/tenant shall pay $200/day until they move out. These sellers/tenants overstayed 41days!!! The buyer/landlord had to go through a proper eviction process & have them evicted by the court. There is a stamped writ of possession by the court with details & a date of possession of the property, this was turned into title to release the funds due to buyer. However the title company refuses to release funds with out both the buyers & sellers consent. Why would they need consent when there is already a legal binding lease/contract in place to avoid these issues!? Now Title has hired a lawyer and threatened to take both seller and buyer to court if they do not come to an agreement on the release of funds. However again, there is already an agreement. 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,465
Posts
3,417
Votes
Tom Gimer
  • DMV
3,417
Votes |
3,465
Posts
Tom Gimer
  • DMV
Replied

@Karen Reyes-Arenas This is a contract matter and nobody can answer the question properly without reviewing the actual contract language. Post-settlement occupancy agreements usually deal with issues in addition to rent/holdover, such as physical damage to the property. There are often dates for providing information to title, and sometimes automatic release provisions for when a party does not timely provide the information. If this agreement was not drawn up properly, the title company may feel like the contract does not address the situation.

That said, the answer may be buried in the fact pattern... the title company doesn't have an in-house attorney so they may not know what they can legally do. There are many title companies who don't have the confidence to make a decision based on the facts in front of them and instead require joint written instructions for everything relating to escrows.

  • Tom Gimer
business profile image
Eastern Title & Settlement
4.9 stars
12 Reviews

Loading replies...