Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

57
Posts
3
Votes
Kenneth Goldman
  • Investor
  • Chicago, IL
3
Votes |
57
Posts

Need Help Knowing a Good Deal

Kenneth Goldman
  • Investor
  • Chicago, IL
Posted

I am looking at a house in Skokie, Illinois where the asking price is $205k. It needs roughly $35-$40k in rehab work. The comps seem to indicate the house may get an ARV of $300k tops (conservatively $290k). I would be using private investor money for purchase and rehab. Using the 70% rule, I should be making an offer of $210k minus rehab costs equaling $175k-$180k. If I buy the house at $205k, I am already $30k over the 70% rule purchase price. Furthermore, do I assume that hard costs are roughly 9% of the ARV? What is the best way to analyze this?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,409
Posts
776
Votes
Ellis San Jose
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Westlake Village, CA
776
Votes |
1,409
Posts
Ellis San Jose
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Westlake Village, CA
Replied

@Kenneth Goldman

The 70% is a guide for flipping, not a rule carved in stone in my book. It helps, as you just saw, when doing a quick & dirty analysis.

I think, at least in the beginning, it is a good discipline.

What complicates things in your example, is that this is a heavy rehab. That adds risk, plus lots of capital requirements.

What if the house was in a hot market & neighborhood where there was low inventory & homes were selling fast in under 45 days.

If you didn't need very much cash to control the property, & if it were an easy property to sell as-is, then you could make a case to bend the rules.

Let's say for example you could control this same house at a contract price of $220k. It was in clean condition & could be sold at a quick sale retail price of $275k because everything else comparable was selling at $290k-$300k, but all you needed to "tie it up" was $2,500 earnest money & then close in 60 days."

Now you sell it for an all cash quick sale for $275k in 30 days, paid a flat fee agent to list it (because the market is so hot no need to market the property very hard) plus closing costs & the buyers broker 2.5%. Assume your total transaction fees are say 8%. No carrying cost because your contract was 60 days to close. So your gross profit is $17,500 & all you needed was the $2,500 check in escrow.

$275,000 sales price

-22,000 transaction cost

-220,000 contract price (80% of sales price )

-------------------------------

$33,000 gross profit (no fix up, no carrying costs)

you were out of pocket $2,500 up front.

If you were wrong you would lose your $2,500 earnest money worst case, if you are right you make $33k .

Would you break the 70% rule in this case?

Loading replies...