Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

57
Posts
3
Votes
Kenneth Goldman
  • Investor
  • Chicago, IL
3
Votes |
57
Posts

Need Help Knowing a Good Deal

Kenneth Goldman
  • Investor
  • Chicago, IL
Posted

I am looking at a house in Skokie, Illinois where the asking price is $205k. It needs roughly $35-$40k in rehab work. The comps seem to indicate the house may get an ARV of $300k tops (conservatively $290k). I would be using private investor money for purchase and rehab. Using the 70% rule, I should be making an offer of $210k minus rehab costs equaling $175k-$180k. If I buy the house at $205k, I am already $30k over the 70% rule purchase price. Furthermore, do I assume that hard costs are roughly 9% of the ARV? What is the best way to analyze this?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,409
Posts
776
Votes
Ellis San Jose
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Westlake Village, CA
776
Votes |
1,409
Posts
Ellis San Jose
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Westlake Village, CA
Replied

@Kenneth Goldman

The 70% is a guide for flipping, not a rule carved in stone in my book. It helps, as you just saw, when doing a quick & dirty analysis.

I think, at least in the beginning, it is a good discipline.

What complicates things in your example, is that this is a heavy rehab. That adds risk, plus lots of capital requirements.

What if the house was in a hot market & neighborhood where there was low inventory & homes were selling fast in under 45 days.

If you didn't need very much cash to control the property, & if it were an easy property to sell as-is, then you could make a case to bend the rules.

Let's say for example you could control this same house at a contract price of $220k. It was in clean condition & could be sold at a quick sale retail price of $275k because everything else comparable was selling at $290k-$300k, but all you needed to "tie it up" was $2,500 earnest money & then close in 60 days."

Now you sell it for an all cash quick sale for $275k in 30 days, paid a flat fee agent to list it (because the market is so hot no need to market the property very hard) plus closing costs & the buyers broker 2.5%. Assume your total transaction fees are say 8%. No carrying cost because your contract was 60 days to close. So your gross profit is $17,500 & all you needed was the $2,500 check in escrow.

$275,000 sales price

-22,000 transaction cost

-220,000 contract price (80% of sales price )

-------------------------------

$33,000 gross profit (no fix up, no carrying costs)

you were out of pocket $2,500 up front.

If you were wrong you would lose your $2,500 earnest money worst case, if you are right you make $33k .

Would you break the 70% rule in this case?

Loading replies...