Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
BRRRR - Buy, Rehab, Rent, Refinance, Repeat
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

109
Posts
47
Votes
Nathan Shankles
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Fresno, CA
47
Votes |
109
Posts

The 2% rule - how close do you stick?

Nathan Shankles
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Fresno, CA
Posted

I bought my two investment properties about 8 years ago and at that time hadn’t heard of Th e 2% rule. When I recently learned of it, I went and did the math. Each of my properties falls between 1.3 and 1.6%. I’m wondering what seasoned rental property investors aim for when it comes to the 2% rule. Do you look for 2% or better? 1.5% or greater? Between 1 and 1.5%?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

15,749
Posts
10,947
Votes
Will Barnard
  • Developer
  • Santa Clarita, CA
10,947
Votes |
15,749
Posts
Will Barnard
  • Developer
  • Santa Clarita, CA
ModeratorReplied

Some of these posts are comical. For CA, anything in the 1.5% range is a heck of a cash flow deal and not easy to find, more often, created. People need to realize that the 2% rule, 1% rule, etc are not Rules at all, merely guidelines meant as a quick back of the napkin analysis. Your purchase decision needs to be made on a full due diligence of the numbers, the property, the market condition,s your goals, strategy, etc, etc. . . .

Any property in this country meeting a 2% rule at purchase is going to be a lower end property likely in a c- or worse area and likely not offer much in the way of appreciation. Ultimately you need to decide for yourself what kind of landlord and investor you want to be. Buying properties for $10k in some states in low end, high crime areas will require some heavy managerial responsibilities and difficulties, legal issues on evictions, etc. These properties may cash flow much larger on a % basis but only you can decide if the risk, time and headaches involved in that asset are worth it for you and your goals.

1% in many areas of different states will equate to break even or even cash negative whereas in some places, may provide small cash flows. In Los Angeles, a single family 3+2 1500 SF standard home built in the 50's is going to run you at least $300k+ (and many areas it will be $500k+) in most areas and is likely not going to bring you $3k+ in rent. The desert cities like Bakersfield and Fresno, parts of the Antelope Valley, etc can find deals in the 1.5% range but they are typically homes that are purchased for sub $200k and not in appreciating areas or in good neighborhoods.

Loading replies...