Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
BRRRR - Buy, Rehab, Rent, Refinance, Repeat
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 1 year ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

4
Posts
0
Votes
Clayton Newman
0
Votes |
4
Posts

How do you think about new deals when your combined ARV > your capital base?

Clayton Newman
Posted

I am new to BRRRR. One consistent thing that keeps coming up in my research is how to handle scaling.

I'll try and dumb it down so it's easiest for me to explain: consider hypothetically starting with $1m and BRRRRing ten $100k properties that each cash flow $1k/mo. Let's also say that these ten properties were magically refi'd such that there was zero slippage (eg every cash purchase managed to pull the same amount out in the re-fi after seasoning).

How do you think about personal finance management when you're continuing to add deals at this juncture (ie your port arv = your capital base)? Is there some rule of thumb you think about when it comes to what you need to be seeing to continue to add deals?

I'm worried about a couple of different things. One, lenders may start cooling down on offering me new deals because they see that my total debt is 700k'ish (30% down on each deal, let's just keep it simple) against my equity of 300k and my cash flow of 10k/month. And if that seems totally reasonable, let's add a zero to everything (7m debt, 3m equity, cash flow 100/month, capital base 1m) and run the same hypothetical.

I'm not aware of some magic number or rule of thumb, but my gut says that when my total mortgage debt becomes meaningfully larger than my capital base I need to pull some levers and tweak some stuff before I can continue adding (eg move some cash flow to grow capital base or pay down more to equity).

Is this making sense at all? 

Thank you for reading

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

4,908
Posts
13,015
Votes
Mike Dymski
Pro Member
#5 Investor Mindset Contributor
  • Investor
  • Greenville, SC
13,015
Votes |
4,908
Posts
Mike Dymski
Pro Member
#5 Investor Mindset Contributor
  • Investor
  • Greenville, SC
Replied
Quote from @Clayton Newman:

Thank you for the reply.

I agree that executing in this environment is challenging, but I am glad to hear that the above is not problematic. I have a lot of experience in finance but not RE and I'm wondering if this degree of scale (debts>capital base) constitutes "leverage" (I don't think it does if my DSCR is meaningfully positive... maybe if I'm allocated to a single market I introduce black swans, I dunno).

Having read the BRRRR book I didn't really see much on how to protect against random downside scenarios when port gets huge. I guess it's a case where cashflow across enough properties makes this less of a headache, but this post was more just me making sure that I have my bases covered against an unknown unknown.

Many of us would never purchase a property in a location that would have concerns for an extended period of vacancy, even during economic downturns.  The eviction moron-atorium in red states was unprecedented but covid squatters were rare and manageable with a larger portfolio (less so with a small portfolio).

Loading replies...