Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Guru, Book, & Course Reviews
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on .

User Stats

9
Posts
1
Votes
Mark Carbonaro
  • New to Real Estate
  • Haddon Heights, NJ
1
Votes |
9
Posts

"Rich Dad, Poor Dad" Chapter 5 Math Check

Mark Carbonaro
  • New to Real Estate
  • Haddon Heights, NJ
Posted

In reading "Rich Dad, Poor Dad", I'm trying to understand how Mr. Kiyosaki's numbers work out the way they do in Chapter 5. Specifically, he gives the example of his first flip where he profited $40,000 from 5 hours of work. His math and the corresponding chart do not make sense to me.

He says the transaction went as follows:

"For $2,000, which was loaned to me from a friend for 90 days for $200, I gave an attorney a cashier's check as a down payment....I asked for a $2,500 processing fee, which [the buyer] gladly handed over...I returned the $2,000 to my friend with an additional $200...I had sold a house for $60,000 that cost me $20,000. The $40,000 was created...in the form of a promissory note from the buyer."

Robert's corresponding chart shows the following:

My confusion lies in that if he sold the house for $60,000, shouldn't the promissory note be worth the price of the sale (i.e. $60,000), not $40,000? Or perhaps if he forgot to mention that the buyer paid $20,000 down and then gave him a $40,000 promissory note, shouldn't the $20,000 mortgage have been paid off/ removed from the liabilities list?

The balance sheet shows a net profit of ($40,000 - $20,000) $20,000, but I infer from the passage that the $40,000 promissory note was profit since "the house sold for $60,000" and "[the house] cost...$20,000." If the buyer only gave him a $40,000 promissory note and he still had a $20,000 mortgage (as made evident by the balance sheet), he would have made $20,000 after paying off the mortgage- not $40,000. Basically, $40,000 + (-$20,000) = $20,000, not "the created" $40,000.

If anyone could explain what I'm missing, I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks!