Vancouver Real Estate Forum
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/hospitable-deef083b895516ce26951b0ca48cf8f170861d742d4a4cb6cf5d19396b5eaac6.png)
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/equity_trust-2bcce80d03411a9e99a3cbcf4201c034562e18a3fc6eecd3fd22ecd5350c3aa5.avif)
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/equity_1031_exchange-96bbcda3f8ad2d724c0ac759709c7e295979badd52e428240d6eaad5c8eff385.avif)
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated almost 2 years ago on . Most recent reply
![Brock Lile's profile image](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/535618/1621483267-avatar-blile.jpg?twic=v1/output=image/crop=752x752@157x0/cover=128x128&v=2)
What are some ABSOLUTE "don'ts" in Washington??
Hello.
I've been searching around to learn more about Washington State-specific laws in relation to investing. I'm mostly focusing on wholesaling right now but these laws would most likely apply to any investor looking for a deal in this state I would imagine.
What I've found so far is to absolutely stay away from pre-foreclosures and foreclosures due to "equity skimming" laws (RCW 61.34). Link: https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=61.34
The second thing I've found is pertaining mostly to wholesalers in that an assignment is a much better way to close that a double-closing.
One question I have is regarding code violations or non-foreclosure evictions. Are there any RCW's related to investors approaching property owners in these situations?
Would a property owner with pending code violations or back-taxes also fall under RCW 61.34 or their definition of a "distressed owner"?
Are there any other Washington-specific issues to know before proceeding to find and close deals in this state?
Thank you in advance!
Keywords: wholesaling Washington state legal laws RCW distressed lawyer attorney
Edit: specified non-forclosure evictions
Most Popular Reply
Originally posted by @Jay Hinrichs:
@Account Closed Mike just curious what you mean about the rules change and enforcement gets nutty ?
in the for whatever its worth file.. I cant think of anything harder to do than try to start from scratch as a wholesaler unless you have a ton of dough.. Guys/gals that i know will spend 20 to 30k a month in marketing. and as you mention they have the ability to close.
Your Question: "just curious what you mean about the rules change and enforcement gets nutty ? In King Co.
Most of my flips were in King Co. The "social justice" emphasis there plays a major role in how the attorneys and courts view a dispute. Lawsuits are filed in county court, so each county handles their own disputes. There are "social justice" pro bono groups in Seattle (King Co.) that love to take cases regarding real estate with no fee to the seller, because real estate investors are "wealthy" and they are scum and they *always* take advantage of minorities. The "pro bono" attorneys collect from the "wealthy" when the "wealthy" investor settles. If you take it to trial you face the possibility of treble damages from the Consumer Protection Act. You have to prove you are Innocent. It gets tedious, expensive and takes a lot of time.
If they lose on the issue, they bring up some other obscure item and if they lose on that they try another. It's a tactic used to wear you down so that you will settle. I had one guy say he "never signed the deed". His attorney, pro bono of course, had no concern that the notary proved he did sign. They let the case continue, ignoring the obvious. It should have been dismissed. The case got transferred to another judge. The seller lied in his deposition that he had never filed bankruptcy. Where in fact he had filed 3 times. You can't hide something like that. The judge let the case continue. It should have been dismissed. The seller is a known liar and untrustworthy. The fact this guy was a known liar made no difference. I just think it is a system out of control. This would never happen in Cowlitz or Thuston. There are no "social justice" groups that would take the case pro bono.
If you review the decisions made by the judges and the complaints in the cases in King Co., it is very different than in Thurston or Cowlitz counties for the same activities. I've had transactions from Bellingham to Vancouver and from Yakima to Spokane Valley and also in the Tri-Cities. When I would get a call in Cowlitz Co. or Thuston Co. I would respond, answer their questions, fill out a form, (since I follow the law it was never a problem for me) and carry on doing business as usual.
When I'd get a call in King Co., proof didn't matter. it was followed up by a complaint (law suit) signed by one of the pro bono groups, and the seller never had to put a penny in. He had nothing to lose and promises of a rich return, 2/3 rds of whatever they collected. This particular case was for $2,000,000 It's very scammy. I took it to trial of course and won. There were a total of 12 attorneys that worked on his side of the case over the course of the law suit.
Many of the judges went to the same law schools in the area and know each other and support "social justice. It tends to be incestuous. You need only to look at who is on the Seattle City Council to get an idea. King County Council is the same. Birds of a feather, which is fine if you are not an investor.
Three attorneys I used at different times moved out of state because in their words "it isn't a question about rule of law in Seattle". It's something totally different.
I lived in an exclusive neighborhood in Seattle for 25 years and most of the people were attorneys and doctors. At Christmas parties, BBQs, other events there was a lot of conversation about law and politics, so you learn a lot about law and where people are coming from pretty quickly.