Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Portland Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

18
Posts
31
Votes
Arie Van Gemeren
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
31
Votes |
18
Posts

To upgrade apartment to 3 Bedroom Unit in NW District (or not)?

Arie Van Gemeren
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
Posted

We recently bought a 5-unit building on NW Kearney Street (right by the hospital) and have an opportunity with our largest unit (+/- 1500 square feet with a private deck and parking spot) to update from a 2/1 to a 3/2. The question is to go 3/2 or go 2/2. My Property Manager tells me that 3 bedroom units are actually more difficult to rent out (in this area) and the tenant quality will be worse. (I should add that no matter what happens, we're adding a 2nd bathroom as it's a 2 story unit and the top story needs a bath. 

I believe that prospective rent on a 3 bedroom in this area is probably in the $3000-3200 range, while prospective rent on a nice 2/2 in the same building is probably max $2700. However, the tenant quality (so I am told) for a 2/2 is significantly higher, while a 3/2 is more likely to attract three separate renters (i.e. a flop house). 

I'm trying to avoid the mistake of managing by spreadsheet (i.e. adding a 3rd bedroom to a very large unit - ~ 1500 square feet) will increase the prospective return for the investment, which looks good on paper, and remember to balance that with property level considerations, quantitative considerations like getting the best tenants. I've also been told that vacancy rates on a 3 bedroom apartment are actually higher than a 2/2 - so the reality might be that going 3 bedroom would actually be worse off economically once you factor that in. 

This is my first investment property, so it's a big consideration. Does anybody have any thoughts on this matter, especially who knows the area well?

Thank you!

Arie 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

71
Posts
24
Votes
Kelvin Lee
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Portland, OR
24
Votes |
71
Posts
Kelvin Lee
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Portland, OR
Replied

I will avoid 3 bedroom on top of the vacancy concern. Sq ft per dollar wise, 1 bedroom is the best return and it is easy to get 1-2 prospects approved at a time. However, it suffers the highest turnover among all 3 types. 3 bedroom  is the worst Sq ft per dollar wise and takes more on repair and maintenance if anything happens. And of course even harder to get 3+ prospects all approved on screening at the same time. If I had a property that I can either go 3 bdrm or 2 bdrm + 1 bdrm, I would pick the latest. My 2 cents. 

Loading replies...