Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Portland Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

71
Posts
25
Votes
Kelvin Lee
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Portland, OR
25
Votes |
71
Posts

Since when the landlord becomes the tenant personal banker?

Kelvin Lee
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Portland, OR
Posted

http://northwestapartmentinvestor.blogspot.com/201...

So now does the landlord is obligated to shop for the bank bearing highest interest for the tenants? Or the landlord will be penalized if fails to do so? How about paying tenants dividend or 10% captain gain as if they are the shareholder of your rental property? 

Chloe Eudaly needs to use her time on fixing the broken bridges getting ready for the BIG ONE and filling pot holes all over PDX.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

19
Posts
6
Votes
Adam Cornell
  • Investor
  • United States
6
Votes |
19
Posts
Adam Cornell
  • Investor
  • United States
Replied
Originally posted by @Matt Garboden:

 @Max Brunke I get it, those are valid statements, but isn't the commissioner's concern for rent affordability valid, as well? This isn't a vigilante legislator. There's a large portion of the city's population calling for something to be done. It feels as if you're dismissing one side of an equation. Is there something you would propose to help with this problem?

After all, the real estate market is a free one and if the returns desired aren't there, capital will flow elsewhere, prices come down, necessary rents come down, rinse, repeat. Correct?

Yes Max, affordability is a problem, and Chloe is trying to "do something" about it. Milton Friedman said (approximately), policy should not be judged by intentions, but rather outcomes. Remains to be seen whether these policies will solve the Portland housing 'crisis,' doubtful. On the other hand this crisis has already been used as a pretext to erode individual liberties, which could turn out to be a bigger deal in the long run. Regardless of cash flow, ROI, my optimism about Portland in general, I am reluctant to invest more in a city and likely the state want to increasingly constrain my business and property. Just philosophically does not suit me. Surely I am not alone. Reduced investment, reduced new units, and that outcome is presently in affect.  I already know the new rules better than the people who wrote them and I will continue to be the best landlord my tenants ever had.  However, if the city (people) of Portland want me to put more skin in the game then they will have to put their money where their votes are. This could take the form of a means tested voucher system funded by all residents if.  

Loading replies...