Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Las Vegas Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

8
Posts
5
Votes
Laurie Wang
  • Investor
  • Austin
5
Votes |
8
Posts

Investing in Vegas - best neighborhoods?

Laurie Wang
  • Investor
  • Austin
Posted

Hi all. First-time investor here looking at single family homes and small multi-family in Vegas for buy and hold. I'm based out of state and interested in getting into Vegas during the potential downturn, as I'm bullish on the market long term once tourism returns.

What areas in Vegas do you invest in and why? 

What impacts have you seen during covid and do you share my long-term optimism on the market?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

7,626
Posts
9,506
Votes
Bill B.#1 Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice Contributor
  • Investor
  • Las Vegas, NV
9,506
Votes |
7,626
Posts
Bill B.#1 Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice Contributor
  • Investor
  • Las Vegas, NV
Replied

@Brian Walters

I wouldn’t think so. I don’t think rent increases have matched property price increases in any country in the history of the planet. Lower priced properties have always returned a higher percent of the purchase price in rent than more expensive ones. 

Think of it this way. A $400k property doesn’t get 4x as much rent as a $100k property. So as my $100k property I purchased 8-10 years ago became a $400k property, rents couldn’t keep up without breaking that dynamic. 

I was getting $1100/mo for these properties say 9 years ago when I bought them for $100k, pretty much 1% rent to price. Hard to find someone to pay $4,400/mo today for a 2000sf cookie cutter Vegas property. 

If this wasn’t true nobody would buy in the cheap Midwest properties that have near zero appreciation. They’re making all their money on the 1% price to rent rule by giving up on any chance of 100, 200 or 300% price appreciation in a decade. Because there’s plenty of inventory and available land. 

People in the expensive west coast areas are taking the opposite side of that bet. They’re getting 0.5% rent to price but buying in markets where the quantity of new properties is substantial throttled by lots of rules/regulations/nimbyism and lack of vacant land. 

Vegas is just a good compromise of the two, like Phoenix and a few other markets. 

As an added thought after I hit post. Lower priced properties have to demand a higher percent of value as rent or nobody would rent them out. 
When an appliance, the AC, or a roof needs replacing on a 2000sf house. They cost about the same if the property is worth $100k or $400k. So suddenly it matters if your rent is 1% of $100k or 0.5% of $400k. 

Loading replies...