Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Las Vegas Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

8
Posts
5
Votes
Laurie Wang
  • Investor
  • Austin
5
Votes |
8
Posts

Investing in Vegas - best neighborhoods?

Laurie Wang
  • Investor
  • Austin
Posted

Hi all. First-time investor here looking at single family homes and small multi-family in Vegas for buy and hold. I'm based out of state and interested in getting into Vegas during the potential downturn, as I'm bullish on the market long term once tourism returns.

What areas in Vegas do you invest in and why? 

What impacts have you seen during covid and do you share my long-term optimism on the market?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

7,740
Posts
9,612
Votes
Bill B.#3 1031 Exchanges Contributor
  • Investor
  • Las Vegas, NV
9,612
Votes |
7,740
Posts
Bill B.#3 1031 Exchanges Contributor
  • Investor
  • Las Vegas, NV
Replied

@Brian Walters

I wouldn’t think so. I don’t think rent increases have matched property price increases in any country in the history of the planet. Lower priced properties have always returned a higher percent of the purchase price in rent than more expensive ones. 

Think of it this way. A $400k property doesn’t get 4x as much rent as a $100k property. So as my $100k property I purchased 8-10 years ago became a $400k property, rents couldn’t keep up without breaking that dynamic. 

I was getting $1100/mo for these properties say 9 years ago when I bought them for $100k, pretty much 1% rent to price. Hard to find someone to pay $4,400/mo today for a 2000sf cookie cutter Vegas property. 

If this wasn’t true nobody would buy in the cheap Midwest properties that have near zero appreciation. They’re making all their money on the 1% price to rent rule by giving up on any chance of 100, 200 or 300% price appreciation in a decade. Because there’s plenty of inventory and available land. 

People in the expensive west coast areas are taking the opposite side of that bet. They’re getting 0.5% rent to price but buying in markets where the quantity of new properties is substantial throttled by lots of rules/regulations/nimbyism and lack of vacant land. 

Vegas is just a good compromise of the two, like Phoenix and a few other markets. 

As an added thought after I hit post. Lower priced properties have to demand a higher percent of value as rent or nobody would rent them out. 
When an appliance, the AC, or a roof needs replacing on a 2000sf house. They cost about the same if the property is worth $100k or $400k. So suddenly it matters if your rent is 1% of $100k or 0.5% of $400k. 

Loading replies...