Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax Liens & Mortgage Notes
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 4 years ago, 03/01/2021

User Stats

239
Posts
100
Votes
Peter Halliday
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Arlington Heights, IL
100
Votes |
239
Posts

Paperstac Non-Performing Underwriting Model

Peter Halliday
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Arlington Heights, IL
Posted

New to notes.  Bought my first Performing note on Paperstac.  I was looking at making an offer on a non-performing note.  I was building an excel underwriting tool myself.  I've taken a commercial real estate course on building commercial real estate underwriting, so this is something I feel I can do.

I was using one of the non-performing notes I was interested in as a case study for building it. I noticed some big problems. When you calculate the payment on what was listed as the original balance, it was MUCH higher as the current payment. The Total Payoff was way higher than the UPB plus the Total fees. A payment based on the Total Payoff, was closer, but still not exactly the same.

My assumption is that when a non-performing is bought a couple of times and the loan is changed and then they become non-performing again, is it common thet the new loan details sometimes isn't don't correctly.  

Loading replies...