Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax Liens & Mortgage Notes
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 12 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1
Posts
0
Votes
Jack Halley
  • Phoenix, AZ
0
Votes |
1
Posts

how does dodd-frank act affect note investing and seller carry back

Jack Halley
  • Phoenix, AZ
Posted

I've been considering getting into note investing but was told to avoid it because of the dodd-frank act could be a big problem. What is this act and why is it a problem for note investors?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,918
Posts
2,087
Votes
Dion DePaoli
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Northwest Indiana, IN
2,087
Votes |
2,918
Posts
Dion DePaoli
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Northwest Indiana, IN
Replied

There is a plentiful amount of regulation both state and federal around mortgages and borrowers. Dobb-Frank provided borrowers with certain protections against predatory lending characteristics. I don't think it is too much of a burden or something to be fearful of anymore than RESPA.

One of the bi-products of DF, is the SAFE Act, there is both state and federal versions, where federal is the minimum standard that a state had to adopt but could have more in their state SAFE Act. For the most part, Seller carry-backs are addressed by the rule. The rule calls for any originator of a loan to have a license except where that loan may pertain to the primary residence of seller. So, a investment property offered with Seller financing is subject to license requirements.

There will likely be some future related legal events arise out of this and some unknowns are present until such time as concepts are challenged in court. For instance, some investors have ignored or have been slow to adhere the license requirements, so those notes in existence but because there has not been an extensive enforcement of rights and remedies, the body of law around non-compliant Seller origination is not filled out well. For instances, it is not well understood how proof or an originator will be provided in when mortgagee and mortgagor are in contest with each other. Will the security instrument be nullified or deemed unenforceable? Not too sure. We will have to see what the future brings on the issue.

That all said, prudent diligence in the purchase of the note or the origination of the note is necessary to protect your interests as an investor. Simply stated, use a fully licensed mortgage broker to originate any Seller mortgage. Get documentation of the same if you purchase one.

Outside of a couple new twists, like above, DF is not any barrier to entry into the note investing world. You do however, need to be aware of more rules and laws when you are a note investor opposed to real property. The first place to always start, is go read the rule for yourself and do not take interpretations of the rule from folks "off the street", which seems to be like the person who said DF is a problem.

  • Dion DePaoli
  • Loading replies...