Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Tax Liens & Mortgage Notes
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

34
Posts
8
Votes
Andrew Farmer
  • Flipper
  • Houston, TX
8
Votes |
34
Posts

Making offers on seller carry back

Andrew Farmer
  • Flipper
  • Houston, TX
Posted

So far all of my deals have been low all-cash offers. I want to start making Sub 2 and seller finance offers. When you make offers for seller carry back, what can you offer to pay them monthly? I've talked to people who offer 1/2 of whatever rental comps are going for. Example, there is a house with minimal needed repairs and rents in the neighborhood are $1200/mo. Would you be able to offer $600/mo. (principle & interest) until the balance is paid off?

I know every situation will be different but is there any rule of thumb for seller carry back offers?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

21,918
Posts
12,880
Votes
Bill Gulley#3 Guru, Book, & Course Reviews Contributor
  • Investor, Entrepreneur, Educator
  • Springfield, MO
12,880
Votes |
21,918
Posts
Bill Gulley#3 Guru, Book, & Course Reviews Contributor
  • Investor, Entrepreneur, Educator
  • Springfield, MO
Replied

A note is a unilateral contract under the law, such contracts cannot be assigned without specific consent of the party receiving the benefit or the note holder in this case. Even if you agree, you need consent. 

An assumption clause allowing a borrower to replace himself with just anyone off the street without consideration to a note holder isn't going to fly in any state.

You can have a due on sale clause, and it is best to, but if there is an assignment agreement then you simply give notice of sale and assignment and that circumvents the due on sale clause, by agreement. 

You cannot shift your financial obligation to another person without consent of the party who is owed, this is a unilateral agreement where the lender relies on specific performance of that borrower, they never had an opportunity to safeguard their investment with Joe Blow, this places the note holder in a position of accepting risk they otherwise would not have accepted. That's why we use the phrase, "consent not unreasonably withheld".  

This applies to all obligations, seller financing, sub-2, wraps, whatever, where you have a financing agreement. 

Sorry, I can't help you with proof reading, LOL :)

Loading replies...