Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax Liens & Mortgage Notes
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

134
Posts
30
Votes
Gabe K.
  • Huntington Beach, CA
30
Votes |
134
Posts

Pay taxes before selling reperforming note?

Gabe K.
  • Huntington Beach, CA
Posted

Team, I have a note that is reperforming and now seasoned and I am going to sell it. The borrower is way behind on her property taxes and is not in a financial position to pay them.  My question is: do I pay all the property taxes now and then sell the note or sell the note at a reduced price and let buyer pay taxes? Does it even matter?

Thank you.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,918
Posts
2,087
Votes
Dion DePaoli
Pro Member
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Northwest Indiana, IN
2,087
Votes |
2,918
Posts
Dion DePaoli
Pro Member
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Northwest Indiana, IN
Replied

From the details in the post this loan is not a candidate for attempting to add the advances to the balance of the loan.  The Borrower can not afford the property if they are barely making the P&I payments.  Adding the advance to the balance of the loan would create a less than favorable position for the Mortgagee.  

When a Borrower fails to maintain taxes and/or insurance (among other ideas) the Mortgagee can make an advance and then the Mortgagee can demand repayment.  Failure to repay those advances gives the Mortgagee a right to accelerate the entire loan balance.  Adding those advances to the loan would remove the Mortgagee's right to accelerate.  This means any new Mortgagee or the existing one would have to wait another year for the same situation to arise to be in a position to take action they are currently in now.    

It is not clear if the Borrower has any capacity to increase their income in the future.  I get the impression it is not a high chance.  If that is the case, I would advance only those taxes due which might result in a tax cert sale and issue a demand to the Borrower to repay.  When the Borrower fails to repay the advance it would be time to accelerate the loan and start a foreclosure process.  That can include some attempts of loss mitigation ideas like DIL or Sale (short?) etc.  

The last comment in the post makes it sound like this is too much of an obligation for the Borrower. If they are "barely" making P&I, then taxes and perhaps insurance are not too far from falling into perpetual non-payment.  Further, this financial situation does not speak well for property maintenance issues that will arise nor future tax and insurance increases as the market continues to recover.  Moral of the story, the Borrower can't afford this property.  While that is sad and nobody (hopefully) wants to displace a Borrower for the sake of displacement, sometimes a Mortgagee has to make the correct decision and not the comfortable one.  

While not all secondary mortgage market investors are the same, if I were reviewing this loan I would not be too far above an NPN price. Maybe..."maybe"...a smal premium on top of NPN price but not much. That is because, that is what it really is. I think sometimes newer note investors want to slap some lipstick on a loan and act like things are all good. Clearly here, they are not. Payment seasoning often get's treated like lipstick. Buyer beware.

Further, adding any advance to the balance will more than likely not be recovered in a secondary market sale.  The discount applied to the loan will also cause the additional balance (which was the advance) to have the same discount.  So if you advance $5k and the loan gets a 65% bid the same 35% discount applies to what you just advanced.  You only get back $3,250.  The only way you are really recovering is based on what your cost basis is in the loan to begin with.  

Moral of the story here.  The best disposition here is likely not selling the loan.  Work the loan through full disposition which may include DIL, Sale or Foreclosure.  Marketing the loan may just be an exercise in time wasting.

  • Dion DePaoli
  • Loading replies...