Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax Liens & Mortgage Notes
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 3 days ago, 01/04/2025

User Stats

2
Posts
0
Votes
Joey Chalhoub
0
Votes |
2
Posts

Tax Lien Foreclosure and Supreme Court Case

Joey Chalhoub
Posted

While 97% of tax liens are redeemed, the best case for the tax lien investor is when the investor gets the property after the owner does not redeem and the investor forecloses on the property. The investor then gets the property for a few percentage points of the total property value. 

My strategy would be to target properties which are most likely of the owner NOT redeeming. Ideally, these would be vacant and abandoned properties that have not been sold in the past 5+ years. I would target high lien to value properties in class C/D areas that are owned by an LLC.

The supreme court case Tyler v. Hennepin County, No. 22-166, Slip Op. at 14 (May 25, 2023) ruled property owners can reclaim any surplus equity resulting from a tax sale. Does this completely prevent the tax lien holder of getting additional gains after foreclosing? 

It seems like this is already the case in Baltimore. Based on this article (https://www.thebaltimorebanner.com/community/housing/baltimo...) it looks like that out of 41,000 tax lien sales, 1,750 were foreclosed on. Of that 1,750 only 180 claimed surplus funds. 

I am not sure if the supreme court would mean that investors cannot claim surplus funds or if its is only the county that cannot. Isn't it unlikely that a homeowner who cant afford a 2-3k tax bill would even challenge this legally?

Would love to connect with others in the tax lien community

Other articles

https://newjerseymonitor.com/2024/02/16/new-jersey-bill-to-r...

Loading replies...