Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Detroit Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago,

User Stats

10
Posts
1
Votes
Nick Rupcich
  • Orlando, FL
1
Votes |
10
Posts

Aluminum Wiring, Fuse Boxes...and Insurance

Nick Rupcich
  • Orlando, FL
Posted

Hi Everyone,

I'm looking at purchasing a flip in Michigan built in 1960. Upon previewing the home I discovered that it does have a fuse box instead of a breaker box. I could not confirm or deny if the home had aluminum wiring- it's 1960 construction date falls a bit before the typical mid 60's-late 70s dates for aluminum, so I suspect it does not but you can never be too careful. In Florida, where I currently flip, insurers will not even come close to aluminum wiring- no prior experience with fuse boxes. 

How do insurers in Michigan handle both fuse boxes and aluminum wiring?

What age homes have you guys found aluminum in?

Loading replies...