Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Rehabbing & House Flipping
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 5 years ago,

User Stats

10
Posts
2
Votes
Julian Dover
  • New to Real Estate
  • Glendale Heights, IL
2
Votes |
10
Posts

Calculate ARV for small multi family properties

Julian Dover
  • New to Real Estate
  • Glendale Heights, IL
Posted

Hello BP community just a quick question reading reading David green BRRRR book and came across a part in the book where he stated that using comps in the area to determine the ARV for multifamily properties was not a correct way to do it because multi-families are based on the income brought in so instead investor look at the cap rate. But I thought the cap rate was used only on large commercial properties only to determine the performance,

so my question is can you apply the ARV strategy for small distressed 2-4 unit multi families as you would for SFH's?

Loading replies...