Hire an architect + owner build, OR hire an expensive GC?

[Benjie DeVera]

I was wondering if anyone can advise me whether or not I will need an architect. I have a project in Glendale, CA in which I am hoping to add square footage and a full bathroom. Given that it's in Glendale, I've only heard that they are strict. 

To save some money, I was thinking of having the owner-build permit. If I do, will the City Planning Department be asking me for drawings and blueprints (which I cannot produce)?? 

Am I better off to hire an architect and have them draft the drawings, and then have a very good, experienced handyman/build (without license) to execute the projects and drawings? I can be at the property to manage and be present as inspections are needed.

Or does anyone have any other thoughts on how to save $$ than hiring a General Contractor (GC) who are usually expensive (up to 4 times more than an unlicensed contractor)?

Any tips on this renovation subject is greatly appreciated! Thanks!

Benjie

[David Nolan]

@Benjie DeVeraIt appears that you have little to no experience in building. Given this is the case then I suggest that before you do anything consult with a GC and or Architect to get a clear understanding of what you are getting yourself into. Re modelling properties is fraught with danger even for the most experienced operators. Don't fall for the trap of thinking it is too expensive to get professionals in to do the work. Quite often the real costs come from fixing mistakes made by not knowing what you are doing. If it is too expensive to hire professionals then the deal is probably not worth the risk.

In regards to being at the property to manage I would suggest that unless you know exactly what is going on, i.e. you are experienced in this kind of work, I am not sure what you would manage. How could you give guidance and instructions to others without knowing what needs to be done?

Hire the professionals and if the figures don't stack up then move on to another deal.

Good luck on your journey!