Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Rehabbing & House Flipping
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

438
Posts
187
Votes
Cornelius Charles
  • Investor
  • Oxnard, CA
187
Votes |
438
Posts

Sellers want to stay in property past the close date on potential rehab

Cornelius Charles
  • Investor
  • Oxnard, CA
Posted

We are in negotiations on a property in Santa Barbara, California where the sellers want to close in ten days, then stay in the properties as "renters" until October 31st.  We calculated the associated costs with this into our offer, so that is accounted for.  We have until Monday evening to decide whether to go through with this or not, but the more we talk to others about this, the more it is sounding like this is a bad idea.  My partner has gone through the eviction process in California, so she is aware of what steps need to be taken.  However, since we will mostly be using hard money for the purchase price, the amount of time they are in the property past October 31st is a lot of money out of our pocket.  We will be in constant contact with the sellers agent until Monday to see if any deal can be made to get them out of the property as soon as possible. If not, we will probably walk away from the deal to avoid the risk of them intentionally staying past October 31st and forcing us to go through the eviction process.  Besides negotiating with the seller's agent, we are also investigating if other funding vehicles are available that we could use to pay off the hard money loan and have a more reasonable interest rate to help lessen the financial burden of them being in the property should an eviction be necessary.  Does anyone know of any other ways that we could mitigate or eliminate the risk of them not leaving prior to the October 31 deadline?  Since we are in Southern California, we do not want to be one of the horror stories you hear about pesky tenants. Thank you in advance.

Cornelius

  • Cornelius Charles
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    212
    Posts
    64
    Votes
    Mark B.
    • Rental Property Investor
    • Morgan Hill, CA
    64
    Votes |
    212
    Posts
    Mark B.
    • Rental Property Investor
    • Morgan Hill, CA
    Replied

    CA allows for a security deposit of 2x rent for unfurnished and 3x rent for furnished. Are they collectable? I would ask an eviction attorney how long evictions take in the area, figure out how much that is going to cost you, subtract out the security deposit and decide on the net if it would be worth it. Since you are getting a hard money loan I'm guessing that you are doing a major rehab anyway so damage, while potentially a major issue, may not be as great.

    Why not hold closing later?

  • Mark B.
  • Loading replies...