Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Rehabbing & House Flipping
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

13,324
Posts
3,945
Votes
Brandon Turner
#3 Questions About BiggerPockets & Official Site Announcements Contributor
  • Investor
  • Maui, HI
3,945
Votes |
13,324
Posts

WOW... a new 24% "Flip" tax?

Brandon Turner
#3 Questions About BiggerPockets & Official Site Announcements Contributor
  • Investor
  • Maui, HI
Posted

Well... San Francisco is at it again! Apparently, according to this news article, there are a number of people backing a “Stop the Flip” proposal that will appear on the November ballot that could create a 25% tax for those who flip properties within a 5 year time frame. 

Thoughts? Do they have any leg to stand on here, or is this just someone being crazy? 

Check out the article and let us know what you think!

  • Brandon Turner
  • Podcast Guest on Show #92
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    1,578
    Posts
    1,618
    Votes
    Amit M.
    • Rental Property Investor
    • San Francisco, CA
    1,618
    Votes |
    1,578
    Posts
    Amit M.
    • Rental Property Investor
    • San Francisco, CA
    Replied

    I have a hard time believing that this wouldn't get reversed in court. SF has an activist "Bored of Stupivisors" that is know for passing local anti real estate ordinances that frequently get reversed at state court, and occasionally even get reversed by minor inconveniences like violating constitutional law. IMO this is a clear taking, and will be challenged. 

    But never mind all that. As an SF investor (who doesn't flip), this, like many other things done here to restrict supply, inevitably increases property values. The RE and rental markets here are so distorted and out of whack compared to any normal market, it has created incredible wealth opportunities for those who know how to play this game. I could write a short book on all the sh!t that's gone down here. (I should title it, making money in inefficient markets.)  Between the bored of stupidvisors, a host of tenant activist organizations, and of course rent control, average condos are close to $1 mil and homes closer to $1.5 mil.  An average 2BR apartments is now renting for at least $3500. And the tech industry juggernaut keeps pushing everything forward!  

    But having invested in SF RE for over 10 years now, all I can say is thank you to all the quasi- socialist policies, the naked tenant pandering, and sometimes just plain sheer stupidity- thank you for creating this highly distorted (and often entertaining) clusterf*ck that has made me a multi millionaire. 

    Tag: @J. Martin 

    Loading replies...