Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Rehabbing & House Flipping
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

34
Posts
5
Votes
Sven Simon
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
5
Votes |
34
Posts

Agent Commission Deal when Flipping

Sven Simon
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

Hi all,

Wondering what your thoughts and experiences are on the following:

I'm a flipper, and as an 'incentive' for agents/brokers, I generally agree for them to be the listing agent of a property that they originally refer and complete with me as the buyer's agent. For example:

John, a realtor in one of my target areas, will call me as soon as a great flip opportunity hits the market. If I end up going after the deal, he'll represent me as the buyer's agent as he brought the opportunity to me. At the same time, I'd have him be the listing agent on this property once I completed the rehab on it.

Therefore, John is 'incentivized' to call me up if he comes across great flip opportunities as he's getting two commissions without any additional 'hustle' (and as part of one original deal).

When I purchase the property, the commission is paid by the seller (and let's just assume that's 3% for my agent - as the buyer's agent). However, what's your thought/experience in regards to what the commission could/should be for my agent when selling the property again? I certainly want to ensure that John is still incentivized but I also want to make sure not to pay 'too much' as he's getting two commissions for presumably less work/time than two seperate deals.

Thanks in advance

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

119
Posts
46
Votes
Jeff Clawson
  • Austin, TX
46
Votes |
119
Posts
Jeff Clawson
  • Austin, TX
Replied

@Sven Simon

I will give you my opinion from an agent that works with multiple investors. If the flip is a good deal, I always have at least 3-4 investors that will buy it. If I present the property to the investor, I expect to get a commission on the purchase, and I expect to get a full 3% commission on the listing. I always present the deal to the investor that is most likely going to close the deal, will re-list with me, and will not challenge me on the commission.

You should NEVER attempt to negotiate the listing commission with an agent that brought you the deal. You are probably not the only investor that they are working with. When the next deal comes up, you want them to send it to you first, right?

I have a very small handful of A+ investor clients that I continuously present deals to. They never challenge me on my commission, and they always see the best deals first. One of them will be making over $1,000,000 this year on properties that I presented to him in Austin, so he has no problems paying my commission.

On the other hand, if YOU find the deal, then you definitely would have some room to negotiate a commission and I would even recommend looking for a flat fee type listing.

Loading replies...