Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Oakland Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

24
Posts
9
Votes
Sudeep Jain
  • Fremont, CA
9
Votes |
24
Posts

Single Family with low GRM in West Oakland?

Sudeep Jain
  • Fremont, CA
Posted

To introduce myself, I am a valley engineer who is tired of working on software and wants to put his money to work. Towards this end, a few weeks ago, I started looking at investments in the bay area. Since this is my first investment and I have no experience in screening tenants, maintenance etc., and I really want an investment, not a second job. :-)  

Looking at SFRs in West Oakland area, the GRMs I am able to calculate are around 5.6% (e.g. gross annual rent of 36,000 on a purchase price of 657,000). My reasoning behind the SFR was:

a. SFRs in that part of the city are a limited commodity, where as a lot of condos can be built vertically and compactly.  

b. No rent control on SFRs.

c. Can do OMI eviction on SFR (though I hope it never comes to that).

d. Rents will be so high that it will make sense for a renter to buy their own in a few years. 

e. Really no other place for people in love with SF to go to. 

The rents just about cover the mortgage and taxes. This means I will only have internal returns for a while, and Ill have to rely on appreciation for the investment to make any sense. Am I missing some crucial piece of information here?

One question I have is, how close to BART is close? Is an SFR about a mile away from BART close enough?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,821
Posts
2,925
Votes
J. Martin
#1 Real Estate Events & Meetups Contributor
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Oakland, CA
2,925
Votes |
3,821
Posts
J. Martin
#1 Real Estate Events & Meetups Contributor
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Oakland, CA
Replied

@Sudeep Jain,
"The rents just about cover the mortgage and taxes. This means I will only have internal returns for a while, and Ill have to rely on appreciation for the investment to make any sense. Am I missing some crucial piece of information here?"

@Andrew Muff,
"The condo we have just appraised for slightly less than your target for the SFR and as that neighborhood improves we expect the appreciation we've experienced to continue."

Hard to decide which signs are the best indicators of the beginning of the end of this cycle: the data, or the speculation and optimism! (it's different this time! ;) @Account Closed - which do you think? hehe 

Andrew, you expect condo appreciation since 2012 in West Oakland to continue? 
Sudeep, we are in the late phase of an expansionary cycle, and appreciation rates are slowing. In addition, West Oakland has some of the more volatile prices in the SF Bay Area, which is why I bought a duplex up by Andrew's place in 2014 for $300K. You will be negative cash flow on your SFR as it sits after paying for maintenance, even more negative cash flow if the significantly increased rents in West Oakland soften, and are buying at a time of the economic cycle that tends to produce the least large appreciation gains, based on history.

The best appreciation gains tend to come after the unemployment rate hits a peak, and the economy starts to improve. They tend to be lower or negative after the unemployment rate hits a low. Look at which years in history have the same jobs characteristics as today and ask yourself if you would have also liked to buy in those years. If your answer is you're a baller tech employee who can afford whatever monthly shortfall, and are holding for 20 years and you don't care, then go for it..

Loading replies...