Oakland Real Estate Forum
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55d/4c55d80d9e9c56307c0657551942956d7cdebf54" alt=""
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc6e/1bc6eaa078f2be59507d8082e9e6c9db9582a7ec" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dee/43dee2bdc33dadf362a5d80e12b9887af577574f" alt=""
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d3e7/7d3e746646d6f56e4824f0d9d7bf92f3eaff3b0d" alt="Sudeep Jain's profile image"
Single Family with low GRM in West Oakland?
To introduce myself, I am a valley engineer who is tired of working on software and wants to put his money to work. Towards this end, a few weeks ago, I started looking at investments in the bay area. Since this is my first investment and I have no experience in screening tenants, maintenance etc., and I really want an investment, not a second job. :-)
Looking at SFRs in West Oakland area, the GRMs I am able to calculate are around 5.6% (e.g. gross annual rent of 36,000 on a purchase price of 657,000). My reasoning behind the SFR was:
a. SFRs in that part of the city are a limited commodity, where as a lot of condos can be built vertically and compactly.
b. No rent control on SFRs.
c. Can do OMI eviction on SFR (though I hope it never comes to that).
d. Rents will be so high that it will make sense for a renter to buy their own in a few years.
e. Really no other place for people in love with SF to go to.
The rents just about cover the mortgage and taxes. This means I will only have internal returns for a while, and Ill have to rely on appreciation for the investment to make any sense. Am I missing some crucial piece of information here?
One question I have is, how close to BART is close? Is an SFR about a mile away from BART close enough?
Most Popular Reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28f5d/28f5d0d562d4c832db1adb9dba01806d6291dcd2" alt="J. Martin's profile image"
- Rental Property Investor
- Oakland, CA
- 2,925
- Votes |
- 3,821
- Posts
@Sudeep Jain,
"The rents just about cover the mortgage and taxes. This means I will only have internal returns for a while, and Ill have to rely on appreciation for the investment to make any sense. Am I missing some crucial piece of information here?"
@Andrew Muff,
"The condo we have just appraised for slightly less than your target for the SFR and as that neighborhood improves we expect the appreciation we've experienced to continue."
Hard to decide which signs are the best indicators of the beginning of the end of this cycle: the data, or the speculation and optimism! (it's different this time! ;) @Account Closed - which do you think? hehe
Andrew, you expect condo appreciation since 2012 in West Oakland to continue?
Sudeep, we are in the late phase of an expansionary cycle, and appreciation rates are slowing. In addition, West Oakland has some of the more volatile prices in the SF Bay Area, which is why I bought a duplex up by Andrew's place in 2014 for $300K. You will be negative cash flow on your SFR as it sits after paying for maintenance, even more negative cash flow if the significantly increased rents in West Oakland soften, and are buying at a time of the economic cycle that tends to produce the least large appreciation gains, based on history.
The best appreciation gains tend to come after the unemployment rate hits a peak, and the economy starts to improve. They tend to be lower or negative after the unemployment rate hits a low. Look at which years in history have the same jobs characteristics as today and ask yourself if you would have also liked to buy in those years. If your answer is you're a baller tech employee who can afford whatever monthly shortfall, and are holding for 20 years and you don't care, then go for it..