Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Investor Mindset
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

142
Posts
104
Votes
Alex Corral
  • Denver, CO
104
Votes |
142
Posts

Duplex vs Triplex vs Quadplex

Alex Corral
  • Denver, CO
Posted

For those who actually own these type of properties, or PM companies as well.. What is your experience with cash flow and vacancy?

Do the duplexes do better, or the tris or quads?

Very interested in hearing your experiences and thoughts!


Alex

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

88
Posts
115
Votes
Jack P.
  • Columbus, GA
115
Votes |
88
Posts
Jack P.
  • Columbus, GA
Replied

@Julian H.

In reality, the costs of the utilities (in this case water) are reflected in the rent.  You can also charge the tenants a utility fee in many locations.  However, it's a marketing thing.  Most tenants look at the simple cost of the rent, and only use that to compare prices.  If I am comparing two similar properties, but one has water included, tenants will likely choose the one with the less expensive advertised rent price, regardless whether or not one has utilities included.

If I'm paying $50/door in utilities, then I can probably only charge $25/door more in rent, compared to a similar separately metered property (that's an arbitrary number, but the point is you don't get as much of a return).  At the same time, tenants are turned off by paying a separate utility "fee" to the owner, as opposed to directly to a utility company.  Plus, feasibility is based on market conditions.  If no other similar units charge a utility fee, then your property is less attractive.

In addition, when there is a huge spike in prices, or you have a vengeful tenant, you're not stuck with the cost.  For example, I had a tenant mad at me because I sent her an eviction notice, so she turned on the water in the laundry room, stuck the hose down the drain, and let it run for a month.  She knew I would be the one paying for it, and there was no way to prove the extra $150 bill that month was due to her.  

Loading replies...